[Esip-citationguidelines] Esip-citationguidelines Digest, Vol 15, Issue 2

[Robert Casey]

	Thank you for the reference to the TCDL RDA Guidelines paper, Reyna.  It was an interesting read and certainly a challenging proposal for many repositories to aspire to.

	My opinion in favor of Option 2 is not really based on having tackled this problem before, but based on the notion that the ONC localized identifier would remain connected to the base DOI.  It just keeps everything together.  This is, of course, assuming you are the minter and maintainer of the DOIs themselves.

	The solution proposed in the Guidelines paper seems like it would work for single subsets of single data sets, but how would a scientist specify an identifier for data that was gathered from multiple datasets and then combined?  It would be a very long list of data-center provided PIDs, which doesn't address the problem of compactness in a paper if they were so referenced.  Is it the scientist's responsibility to compose a single PID landing page for their compositions?

	-Rob



> On Mar 28, 2020, at 9:00 AM, esip-citationguidelines-request at lists.esipfed.org wrote:
> 
> Send Esip-citationguidelines mailing list submissions to
> 	esip-citationguidelines at lists.esipfed.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-citationguidelines
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	esip-citationguidelines-request at lists.esipfed.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	esip-citationguidelines-owner at lists.esipfed.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Esip-citationguidelines digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. input on how to represent subset query PIDs in ISO 19115
>      (Reyna Jenkyns)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:26:30 +0000
> From: Reyna Jenkyns <reyna at uvic.ca>
> To: "esip-citationguidelines at lists.esipfed.org"
> 	<esip-citationguidelines at lists.esipfed.org>
> Subject: [Esip-citationguidelines] input on how to represent subset
> 	query PIDs in ISO 19115
> Message-ID: <1585333590507.4899 at uvic.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I wanted to get your opinion on how to represent the subset query PID in an ISO 19115-1:2014 record as per the RDA Data Citation WG (https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/data-citation-wg.html) guidelines for dynamic data citations (https://www.rd-alliance.org/system/files/documents/TCDL-RDA-Guidelines_160411.pdf). 
> 
> There seems to be two potential options. With either option, we would have the DataCite DOI information listed under MD_DataIdentification>citation(CI_Citation)>identifier(MD_Identifier)>code as the DataCite DOI and the authority as DataCite. 
> 
> OPTION 1 - adding an additional identifier (parallel to the DataCite DOI) with code as the local ONC subset query pid and ONC as the authority 
> 
> OPTION 2 - extending the identifier entry used for the DataCite DOI with the 'otherCitationDetails field, which could be populated with ONC's local subset query PID and some extra text to explain. 
> 
> I think my preference is OPTION 1, but wanted to get some input and to see what others may have done. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Reyna
> 
> Reyna Jenkyns | Data Stewardship Manager
> Ocean Networks Canada | T 250 853 3908 | M 250 415 3336 | oceannetworks.ca
> #100-2474 Arbutus Road, Victoria, BC, V8N 1V8
> ORCID: 0000-0001-6975-6816
> 
> A UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA INITIATIVE
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-citationguidelines mailing list
> Esip-citationguidelines at lists.esipfed.org
> https://lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-citationguidelines
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Esip-citationguidelines Digest, Vol 15, Issue 2
> ******************************************************