[Esip-citationguidelines] Esip-citationguidelines Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3

[Robert Casey]

	Hi Mark-

	Looking at the matrix for group 2, I am wondering where datasets from DOI-designated data sources that are continuous data streams (for years many times) would fit in?  No user will access the entirety of the dataset unless it is finite in time.  Would this fall under granules?

	If so, I see Rama's suggestion that each granule should be uniquely identified so as to be reproducible.  I agree that this is the ideal, but not always a practical first step.  Should we have an additional level of citation that acknowledges the data source as a whole? (absent identifying each extracted data granule).

	Thank you!

	-Rob


> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:11:42 -0700
> From: Mark Parsons <parsonsm.work at icloud.com>
> To: Esip-citationguidelines
> 	<esip-citationguidelines at lists.esipfed.org>
> Subject: [Esip-citationguidelines] citation cluster status
> Message-ID: <DA8FA778-93B2-4F2C-9398-E71593D1F8E4 at icloud.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Friends,
> 
> I have finally put some crude notes together from our November meeting: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18ooEixbchKp-qgAG7qtnebKrWDYsutt4d2eX3HsaWls/edit#
> 
> Note we have our next meeting to finalize our plans for the the winter meeting on 7 Jan. (Invite coming)
> 
> The ?Winter Mtg 2021? tab of the matrix <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VEYPLgTsCR_zbMUbThonBrqaYqBiMT4e525NzFi7ql8/edit?usp=sharing> shows what I?ve done. 
> 
> Artifact class leads (Dan, Ruth, Sarah, Nancy, Mark) should try to complete the matrix as much as possible in advance. I tried to do it for the data cluster (Madison, please review). I hope that provides a guide.
> 
> Talk to y?all on the 7th in what we hope will be a much better year.
> 
> Merry, merry,
> 
> -m. 
>