[Esip-citationguidelines] FW: Re: [EXTERNAL] EOS article for discussion tomorrow

[Nancy Hoebelheinrich]

Yes;  we called them “learning resources” although “educ resources” would fit better.

Nancy

 

From: Esip-citationguidelines [mailto:esip-citationguidelines-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Ruth Duerr via Esip-citationguidelines
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 1:09 PM
To: Daniel S. Katz
Cc: Esip-citationguidelines
Subject: Re: [Esip-citationguidelines] ***SPAM*** Re: [EXTERNAL] EOS article for discussion tomorrow

 

I love version 3 of Rama/s diagram; but I wish I remembered which was the 5th analyzed group.  Was it educational resources?  Nancy?  

 

I fixed one small thing on the diagram.

 

Ruth

 

On Feb 18, 2022, at 2:53 PM, Daniel S. Katz via Esip-citationguidelines <esip-citationguidelines at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:

 

I think it looks fairly good.

 

My one thought is to somehow show that some things didn't work and that's the reason we went to the next thing.

 

Dan

 

On Feb 18, 2022, at 3:48 PM, Hampapuram Ramapriyan <hampapuram.ramapriya at ssaihq.com> wrote:

 

All,

I have taken a shot at a figure. All of you should have permission to comment. Here is the link -https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1cLY265_iM77zzlgW34WrRa7Wcv17_yfqL49JqX7tohg/edit#slide=id.p

Please let me know what you think. As I said, I am not a good artist, but I wanted to put down at least approximately what I had in mind.

Thanks.

Rama.   

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-citationguidelines/attachments/20220221/644b9bf6/attachment-0001.htm>