<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hi All,</p>
<p>This graphic from the draft FAIR-DQI community guidelines was
presented in yesterday's OGC DQ domain working group meeting:</p>
<p><img src="cid:part1.BE53B495.1F0B6757@colorado.edu" alt=""></p>
<p>which leads me to ask whether it makes sense to expand the
"quality" umbrella to include things that don't pertain to the
inherent attributes of the data itself. What is the benefit to the
community of duplicating all the work that has gone into defining
features of a trustworthy digital repository? Adding services to a
dataset doesn't necessarily improve its quality. How well the
quality of a dataset is conveyed in metadata is a feature of the
metadata, not the dataset.<br>
</p>
<p>Open to hearing other's opinion on this.</p>
<p>Best wishes,</p>
<p>SiriJodha<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Siri-Jodha Singh KHALSA, Ph.D., SMIEEE
National Snow and Ice Data Center
University of Colorado
Boulder, CO 80309-0449
Traditional Territories of the Arapaho, Cheyenne and Ute Nations
Office: 1-303-492-1445 GV: 1-303-736-9976 EU: +420 608 720 281
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9217-5550">http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9217-5550</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>