[Esip-preserve] ESIP Citation Guidelines

[Curt Tilmes]

On Oct 13, 2010, at 10:28 AM, alicebarkstrom at frontier.com wrote:
 > > If you want to start in on collections (or aggregations), see
 > > my previous e-mail on what level of detail we need to identify
 > > in citations.  Ruth and I have sort of parted company on this,
 > > since I think the distinctions between collections is imporant
 > > and she's wanted to call everything a "dataset".

On 10/18/10 09:22, Curt Tilmes wrote:
> On 10/15/10 17:02, Ruth Duerr wrote:
>> On the other hand, I do believe that Curt's definition of an ESDT +
>> Collection (i.e., dataset along with version) as the object that is
>> assigned a unique DOI is sound, especially when accompanied by a
>> date of access; but that later bit drifts off of the identifier
>> discussion to citation guidelines - two different discussions
>> (though I agree identifiers are foundational to both).

Oops.  My previous message also misuses the term "dataset" since
we haven't consensused that yet...

Curt