[Esip-preserve] possible session at ESIP

Erin Robinson erinrobinson at esipfed.org
Mon Oct 26 10:17:31 EDT 2015


Hi Guys -

Chiming in here - I think it is a fantastic idea, Mark. I agree with Denise
that it is broader than Data Stewardship and lines up well with our new
strategic plan. I can set up a doodle to get an initial call started on the
topic.

I'm happy to help organize this session. Maybe we can get Lindsay Powers to
help too...??

E


On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Denise Hills via Esip-preserve <
esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:

> I’ll add my agreement that I think this is a very good idea. It is broader
> than Data Stewardship, but it could partially fall under that umbrella. One
> thing that I think sessions for the Winter meeting are attempting is
> highlighting what strategic plan goal it aligns with. This session would
> definitely address all 4 goals (see here:
> http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/2015-2020_Strategic_Plan if you need a
> reminder what those goals are).
>
> While there might be a lot to cover, I think we could fit it in a 1.5 hour
> session if done right. We’d need to limit the overview part to very brief,
> lightning-style talks, so that the majority of the time could focus on
> developing the roadmap forward.
>
> Mark, I may not be the best person to help you organize this, but I’m
> willing - especially as I’d like to understand more about what’s happening
> in various groups!
>
> -d
>
>
>
> On Oct 26, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Ruth Duerr via Esip-preserve <
> esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I second Kerstin on this; perhaps it needs to be split into 2 sessions;
> one on reports out - one on discussion?
>
> Ruth
>
> On Oct 26, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Kerstin A Lehnert via Esip-preserve <
> esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think that is a great idea and it would be highly valuable to develop
> some vision and maybe even a roadmap how the various initiatives could work
> together to maximize impact with coordinated development and implementation
> of both technology and policies. In addition to the projects,
> organizations, and initiatives that you mention, I would like to also make
> sure that EarthCube is more embedded in these activities.
>
> I would think that this session would need more than the regular 1.5
> hours, just considering the time it would take to have each one give a
> short overview of goals, structure, and activities. It would be important
> to agree on some critical goals for such session.
>
> Could we set up a call through ESIP or RDA to start a dialog about this
> session?
>
> Kerstin
>
>
> On 10/26/15 08:35 AM, Parsons, Mark via Esip-preserve wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have not been keeping up with conversations about winter meeting
> planning, but I have a session idea that I’d like to hear people’s thoughts
> on. I don’t know if this belongs under the stewardship committee or more
> broadly, but it would seem worthwhile to have a discussion on strategic
> partnerships for ESIP.
>
> There’s a lot going on in the data world these days. Is ESIP playing an
> appropriate role? I’m of course thinking of RDA, but there is also the
> Council of Data Facilities and COPDESS. The Belmont Forum e-infrastructure
> initiative is moving in to an implementation phase, whatever that might
> mean. RDA/US is coordinating a collaboration effort of domain repositories
> to try and amplify their voice at a national level (this includes non-Earth
> science repositories). The National Data Service is up and running and
> exploring some test bed activities with RDA/US. Force11, CODATA, and others
> are doing things about data citation. I’m sure there’s more.
>
> ESIP members are involved in all these activities and maybe that’s
> sufficient, but maybe we could be more coordinated and strategic. Perhaps
> this is just a discussion at the business meeting, but I think it could be
> more. We could hear short reports on the various initiatives and then
> discuss ways forward. We had the beginnings of this conversation in Copper
> Mountain last summer. It would be good to continue.
>
> What do people think? I could help coordinate, but I’d want help.
>
> cheers,
>
> -m.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
>
> --
> Dr. Kerstin Lehnert
> Director, Interdisciplinary Earth Data Alliance
> Director, EarthChem
> President, IGSN e.V.
>
> Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
> Columbia University
> Palisades, NY, 10964
> (845) 365-8506
> http://www.iedadata.org
> http://www.earthchem.org
> http://www.igsn.org
>
> <lehnert.vcf>_______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20151026/1276689b/attachment.html>


More information about the Esip-preserve mailing list