[Esip-preserve] time to update the citation guidelines?

[ruth.duerr3 at gmail.com]

Great!  Ditto re choosing a NASA citation...

Ruth

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 20, 2016, at 1:41 PM, Hampapuram Ramapriyan <hampapuram.ramapriya at ssaihq.com> wrote:
> 
> Ruth,
> For NASA Earth science data the following might of interest: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/earth-observation-data/data-citations-acknowledgements and https://earthdata.nasa.gov/open-data-and-the-importance-of-data-citations-the-nasa-eosdis-perspective from a general “policy” point of view. I can provide a couple of specific citation examples as well. Again, we are basing this work on the ESIP guidelines, pointed to at the bottom of the page led to by the first link above.
> Rama.
>  
> From: Esip-preserve [mailto:esip-preserve-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Ruth Duerr via Esip-preserve
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 12:35 PM
> To: Jeff de La Beaujardiere - NOAA
> Cc: esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> Subject: Re: [Esip-preserve] time to update the citation guidelines?
>  
> Thanks Jeff!  I am sure we will use at least one example from NOAA (want to get a variety of examples from a variety of places).
>  
> And obviously the NOAA Directive should be on our reference list (if it isn’t already)...
>  
> Ruth
>  
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Jeff de La Beaujardiere - NOAA <jeff.delabeaujardiere at noaa.gov> wrote:
>  
> Feel free to use any of the following as real-world examples:
> http://search.datacite.org/ui?q=10.7289&fq=resourceType_facet:%22Dataset%22
>  
> Also feel free to borrow any ideas or text from the NOAA Data Citation Directive, which was inspired by the original ESIP guidelines: https://nosc.noaa.gov/EDMC/PD.DC.php
>  
> -Jeff DLB
>  
> 
> Jeff de La Beaujardiere, PhD 
> NOAA Data Management Architect 
> 1335 East-West Hwy, Silver Spring MD 20910 USA 
> +1 301 713 7175 (NESDIS/ACIO-S - SSMC1/5308) 
> ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1001-9210
>  
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Parsons, Mark via Esip-preserve <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
> Yes. Probably a bit overdue. It would be nice to have real world examples instead of “The Foo Data Set” too.
>  
>  
> cheers,
>  
> -m. 
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 13:04, Ruth Duerr via Esip-preserve <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>  
> Hi all,
>  
> I’ve been fielding questions from all directions on use of DOI’s for data sets, etc.  I think it is time to update the ESIP guidelines with better identifier information.  Anyone interested in helping with that?  Is it a good idea?  I think this is still a moving field; but I do believe that there are better and worse ways of moving forward and would like ESIP to promulgate the better ways…
>  
> Thoughts?
>  
> Ruth
>  
> "I have met some pretty crappy “scientists” at institutions who get paid well, but don’t do science and wouldn’t know it if it pooped on their feet. In contrast, many people who have investigated some of the most pressing and interesting issues of the last couple of centuries did it out of curiosity, excitement, worry, or desperation.”
>  
> - Fraser Shilling in email to citsci-discussion-l at list.cornell.edu discussion list
>  
> Ruth Duerr
> Research Scholar
> Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship
> ruth.duerr3 at gmail.com
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
> 
>  
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20160620/8a025819/attachment.html>