[Esip-semanticharmonization] Reminder on today's (9/16/20) ESIP Semantic Harmonization group meeting

[Gary Berg-Cross]

>
> The ESIP Semantic Harmonization Topic for work may be TBD, but work on
> the 5 pager was mentioned last week during the Hackathon session...but we
> are almost done with

the Cryo terms.....
> To join our ESIP Semantic Harmonization group meeting
> from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/800617765
>
> You can also dial in using your phone.
> United States: +1 (408) 650-3123
> <+14086503123,,800617765#>Access Code: 800-617-765


Gary Berg-Cross Ph.D.
Independent Consultant
Potomac, MD
240-426-0770

Alexis de Tocqueville,  who studied us in the 1830s, wrote
<https://books.google.com/books?id=SNYZBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA108&lpg=PA108&dq=%E2%80%9CIndividualism,+at+first,+only+saps+the+virtue+of+public+life%22&source=bl&ots=0-7nby6tpn&sig=ACfU3U38h5a0gmoZPAzlrR15Z6LA96TmHg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRu-yt_7vrAhVYlXIEHcPkD3EQ6AEwAnoECAIQAQ#v=onepage&q=%E2%80%9CIndividualism%2C%20at%20first%2C%20only%20saps%20the%20virtue%20of%20public%20life%22&f=false>
that
America’s cult of individualism was perilously close to raw selfishness —
the “me first” instinct we often see today.

“Individualism, at first, only saps the virtue of public life, but, in the
long run, it attacks and destroys all others, and is at length absorbed in
downright selfishness” — a strait that he warned “blights the germ of all
virtue.”


On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:24 AM Gary Berg-Cross <gbergcross at gmail.com>
wrote:

> The ESIP Semantic Harmonization group meeting is today *September 9, 2020*
> * @ **2:00 pm** - **4:00 pm E**astern time*
>
> ──────────────────────────────────────────
> * Please join **our ** meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.*
>
>
> *https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/800617765
> <https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/800617765>*
>
>
> *You can also dial in using your phone.*
>
>
> * United States: +1 (408) 650-3123*
>
>
> *Access Code: 800-617-765*
>
>
> *Some general info and links on *
> https://wiki.esipfed.org/SemanticHarmonization
>
>
> There was a general agreement is yesterday’s Sem Tech session that we would
>
> use this as a hackathon-style effort and focus this harmonization session
> on the mapping of Cryo
>
> terms to EnvO (and SWEET). We had been matching more things up with SWEET
> and ticketing issues.
>
> See the Cryohackathon spreadsheet
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XmqB5F1SKLZ3y-PIVdQByU3Eho4cHAnUUafko3JNtn0/edit#gid=1512660924>
> for the terminologies.
>
> Example:
>
> periglaciation
>
> proglacial
>
> subglacial
>
> supraglacial
>
>
>
> depth hoar
>
> frost
>
> granular ice
>
> hoar crystal
>
> ice
>
> ice crystal
>
>
>
> As context some notes from our May session on terms.
>
>
> May 13th Meeting (before our focus on the 5 pager and the ESIP Summer
> session)
>
> See
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O-3UW1RLp1UNaS2sNWfpIULmgIedB0NCBsYd1MaWWZY/edit#gid=0
>
>
> …..harmonizing EnvO and SWEET (along the semantic gradient) not solving
> all of SWEET’s issues.
>
>               SWEET  “glaciation” maps to EnvO “glacial ice gain”.
>
> Ruth notes that glaciations as time periods are named (e.g. Pleistocene).
>
>
>
> Chuck geo-schema (with OWL-Time) might provide a cross walk for the 2
> ontologies looking at geo-time periods.
>
>
>
> Work included editing Chuck’s owl file such as deprecating
> “periglaciation”.
>
>
>
> Getting back to harmonizing EnvO and SWEET (is this a 2 step process? If
> we add the terms to SWEET, clean them up AND then see how to map to EnvO.) :
>
> Issue #185 - definition of “glaciation”. Involves meaning of “glacial” and
> its sub-properties. Ruth notes 3 different meanings of glaciation in GCW
> depending on the discipline. So 3 sub-types of Glacial Process?
>
> For example difference noted of glaciers advancing to cover land, vs.
> “glacial ice gain” (mass).
>
>
>
> Issue 190: related to Issue 185. Will be resolved in the quality section
> of EnvO/PATO.
>
>
>
> Glacial retreat (Maybe also Glacial Advance).  May now be more of a
> non-issue for alignment but is a SWEET issue - is it a sub-class of
> “melting”. Probably not.
>
> Issue 185: shows the need to revise the whole branch area in SWEET.
>
>
>
> Environmental zone discussion- some distinctions made by NEON about named
> entity/ sampling sites.  They may have fiat boundaries rather than boundary
> from a physical process.
>
> Q:  Does an ablation zone have to be Part-Of a glacier...or is it
> overlapping? This hasn’t been answered by the Cryo community.  To some iit
> can be elsewhere such as on an ice sheet.
>
> So EnvO might have an “ice ablation zone” as well as the more general “
> ablation zone”.
>
> Some discussion of geo-relations in BFO rather than Egenhofer relations.
>
>
>
> Issue: Alpine - resolved exact match issue and noted issue in SWEET about
> tundra concept.
> Gary
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-semanticharmonization/attachments/20200916/7aedda49/attachment-0001.htm>