[Esip-citationguidelines] Data citation meeting tomorrow

[Parsons, Mark]

Thanks. We’ll miss you, but you’ve made good contributions.

-m.
Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 6, 2019, at 19:05, Hampapuram Ramapriyan <hampapuram.ramapriya at ssaihq.com<mailto:hampapuram.ramapriya at ssaihq.com>> wrote:

Mark,
Sorry I will have to miss tomorrow’s telecon due to a conflict. I have marked up the document with some edits and comments. Hope it helps.
Rama.

From: Esip-citationguidelines [mailto:esip-citationguidelines-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Parsons, Mark via Esip-citationguidelines
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2019 2:50 PM
To: Esip-citationguidelines
Subject: [Esip-citationguidelines] Data citation meeting tomorrow

Friends,

I have a near complete draft of the revised data citation guidelines
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DjM8SBJOOSSwANoOmW6arN-KiwAv1895K0tZkLU5sxs/edit?usp=sharing

Sorry for the late notice, but please review prior to the meeting tomorrow, 7 Feb. at 10 Pacific/13 Eastern. We’ll just walk through the comments and suggestions, and maybe we can finalize things.

Meeting info:
Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/429077789
You can also dial in using your phone.
United States: +1 (646) 749-3112
Access Code: 429-077-789

Notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18ooEixbchKp-qgAG7qtnebKrWDYsutt4d2eX3HsaWls/edit?usp=sharing


One thing I discovered in the process, is that the DCC has substantially revised their guidelines since last time:
http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides/cite-datasets#sec:units<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dcc.ac.uk%2fresources%2fhow-guides%2fcite-datasets%23sec%3aunits&c=E,1,C-OWKG3s118u5pUcIZX2AnLb-adOoLlBnmZr3Y-CNgBB7I2s00vebGqyG1d8nq0TpDwLx_jckszk-J3wRlR2NFvrg8Qh6xUlS_RUSSwh1lpQlXZ-_76WBYpslg,,&typo=1>

I wish I had know this earlier. The document is a vast improvement from their earlier version, is very well-referenced (albeit biased to European work), and has more detail. In many ways their guidelines are better than ours. The only big difference is that their versioning approach is still not very useful for rapidly updating time series. Also they don’t have the nice metadata mapping that we do, or any discussion of schema.org<http://schema.org>. I encourage you all to read the document before our meeting.

Some things to note:
- They have additional core elements, including a UNF, “Edition” as well as ‘version', and an ISO standard used to reference subsets that we should consider. They also explicitly separate ‘identifier' and ‘location’ (although they don’t reference us).
- They recommend the use of identifiers for people and organizations.
- They provide a little bit of guidance on granularity.
- They have guidance on referencing physical data
- They have some (slightly dated) guidance on citation tracking and notification. Perhaps we could include this in version 1.2. I am especially intrigued by the W3C Linked Data Notification (LDN) standard

Talk soon.

cheers,

-m.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-citationguidelines/attachments/20190207/e359913a/attachment.html>