[Esip-documentation] Geospatial Bounds

[Aleksandar Jelenak via Esip-documentation]

On 9/22/14, 6:25 PM, “Ted Habermann"
<esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>The definition should say something about the CRS as the order of the
>coordinates in the WKT actually depends on the CRS (I think).

I prefer this to introducing a new attribute just for CRS. How about the
WGS-84 CRS (EPSG code: 4326)? This CRS prescribes that order of
coordinates be latitude, longitude, altitude.

>Also, if the definition is going to include an example, lets use numbers
>that are unambiguously longitude (i.e. > 90).

+1

	-Aleksandar