[Esip-documentation] ACDD adjudication call -- agenda etc. (last summary mail from me!)
David Neufeld - NOAA Affiliate via Esip-documentation
esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org
Thu Oct 2 12:02:58 EDT 2014
Hi All,
I likely won't make the first part of the call.
I don't think geospatial bounds should include a datum as part of the
definition (I am OK with *recommending* that the values use a specific
datum). If we force datum into the definition we are excluding a large
portion of the community which seems like a poor convention. Yes a datum
makes sense for our remote sensing/gps folks but not for much of the ocean
community.
Hope to join in, but if not look forward to hearing the results of the call.
John thanks for being brave and organizing this!
Dave
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Erin Robinson via Esip-documentation <
esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
> Hi All -
>
> The call-in info is same as the regular calls. It's here:
>
> To join the meeting:
> To join the online portion of the meeting: Go to
> https://esipfed.webex.com/mw0401l/mywebex/default.do?siteurl=esipfed&service=1
> Meeting Password: 23138372
> Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-877-668-4493 Attendee access
> code: 23138372
>
> E
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:03 AM, John Graybeal via Esip-documentation <
> esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> First of all, my big thanks to everyone for voting your favorite approach
>> to this process. With color coding it was real clear how we needed to
>> proceed, so good show.
>>
>> So we'll have the adjudication call at 2 PM Eastern / 11 AM Pacific time.
>> One way or another we'll get the call-in info to the list, it sounds like
>> we're good to go on that front.
>>
>> We're working with columns F (Version 1.3.1 Attributes and G (Version
>> 1.3/1.3.1 Definitions) in the Version Changes
>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19fl5AgGkckG03yTchUjYUp4YnR09Fn1Nqps2KHenkC4/edit#gid=849563469> page.
>> And I added a column H, Issue Raised, where I've documented the significant
>> issues I know about.
>> I think the 3 groups we have to cover are:
>> 1) Issues from column H -- if you have a new issue that needs
>> adjudication, put it here before the meeting
>> 2) Any issues remaining from the Active Issues
>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19fl5AgGkckG03yTchUjYUp4YnR09Fn1Nqps2KHenkC4/edit#gid=0>
>> page.
>> 3) Consent for the rest of the text in the Definitions, and the rest of
>> the material, including the introductory text
>>
>> If we're lucky, disciplined, and extraordinarily willing to compromise,
>> we could get through all that in an hour. If not, we'll see whether people
>> want to do at that point.
>>
>> If you won't be there but want your voice/concerns heard, you can read
>> the materials first thing in the morning and send an email to the list, say
>> by an hour before the meeting. We can't afford to re-argue already-decided
>> issues in the main ESIP Documentation meeting, if we resolve them tomorrow,
>> so let's give this meeting our best shot.
>>
>> As Aleksandar says, I'm looking forward to remaining colleagues afterward!
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------
>> John Graybeal
>> Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Esip-documentation mailing list
>> Esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org
>> http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-documentation
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-documentation mailing list
> Esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org
> http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-documentation
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-documentation/attachments/20141002/6b788e96/attachment.html>
More information about the Esip-documentation
mailing list