[Esip-documentation] proposed new wording for geospatial bounds attributes

[Aleksandar Jelenak via Esip-documentation]

John,

I support the proposed definitions. Below are my minor corrections,
hopefully useful.

On 10/15/14, 3:07 PM, "ESIP Documentation LIst"
<esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>geospatial_bounds:
>
>
>The meaning and order of values for each coordinate point depends on the
>coordinate 

“points’ coordinates” instead of “coordinate point"

>The values may be approximate.

Remove this sentence because I think it will mostly confuse users.


>geospatial_bounds_crs:
>
>
>The coordinate reference system (CRS) used by the coordinates in the

“of the point coordinates” instead of “used by the coordinates”.


>supplied) must match the dimensionality, order, and meaning of point
>values in the 

“point coordinate values” instead of “point values”.


>geospatial_bounds_vertical_crs:
>
>
>The vertical coordinate reference system used by the Z coordinates in the

“Z point coordinate” instead of “Z coordinates”.


	-Aleksandar