[Esip-infoquality] Reminder: Request for Review - FAIR DQI Guidelines

[Ge Peng]

Big “Thank You” to those who have provided great comments, questions and
suggestions - appreciate the time and effort in going through the document
thoroughly! I have updated and will continue to update the review template
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Xqu0Rj-rkWQnDZ7zyBEi_ys5IrOTboe4/edit>to
reflect the received edits - recommended changes are not final and may
change as the result of additional comments from the community and working
group members.

Gentle reminder to send your feedback to us in the coming weeks, preferably
prior to Friday June 4. Please let us know if you have any questions or
will need more time.

If you are interested in providing feedback on the guidelines
<https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xsu4p> but are short in time, you may
focus on Subsection 4f (from line 470, p15 to line 628, p18) and read other
sections for more information if needed.

Your feedback is important in improving the quality, including the
comprehensiveness, of the guidelines and we really appreciate your time and
effort!

Best regards,

Ge Peng, Carlo Lacagnina, and Ivana Ivánová
On behalf of the International FAIR-DQI Community Guidelines Working Group

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:26 AM Ge Peng <gp0043 at uah.edu> wrote:

> My apologies for cross-posting in an attempt to reach a wider audience to
> get community feedback from different points of view. Please feel free to
> share it with your colleagues. To opt out future messages on this topic,
> please send me an email.
>
> On behalf of the International FAIR-DQI Community Guidelines Working
> Group, I would like to invite you to review a complete draft of community
> guidelines for sharing and reusing quality information of individual Earth
> science datasets.
>
> The International FAIR-DQI Community Guidelines Working Group is currently
> consisted of 22 international, inter-disciplinary domain experts and is led
> by the ESIP Information Quality Cluster co-chairs, the Barcelona
> Supercomputing Center Evaluation and Quality Control team leads, the
> Australia/New Zealand Data Quality Interest Group and OGC Data Quality
> Domain Working Group co-chairs.
>
> The draft guidelines document can be downloaded at:
> https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xsu4p
>
> A Google Form that facilitates anonymous comment collection can be
> accessed: here <https://forms.gle/3sAnW3B3Jxn5ZMig9> (also
> https://forms.gle/3sAnW3B3Jxn5ZMig9), which will be available until Friday
> June 4, 2021.
>
> Alternatively, you can download this template
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xqu0Rj-rkWQnDZ7zyBEi_ys5IrOTboe4/view?usp=sharing>,
> capture all your comments and suggestions and send it to Ge Peng at
> ge.peng at uah.edu, Carlo Lacagnina at carlo.lacagnina at bsc.es, or Ivana
> Ivánová at ivana.ivanova at curtin.edu.au.
>
> Community feedback is important in helping us improve the quality of the
> document prior to its first baseline. Please feel free to contact us if you
> have any questions or concerns or if you are interested in developing a use
> case.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ge Peng (Peng)
>
> On behalf of the International FAIR-DQI Community Guidelines Working Group
>
> --
>
> Ge Peng, PhD
>
> Sr. Principal Research Scientist
>
> Earth System Science Center/NASA MSFC IMPACT
>
> The University of Alabama in Huntsville
>
> Ge.Peng at uah.edu
>
> ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1986-9115
>


-- 

Ge Peng, PhD

Sr. Principal Research Scientist

Earth System Science Center/NASA MSFC IMPACT

The University of Alabama in Huntsville

Ge.Peng at uah.edu

ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1986-9115
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-infoquality/attachments/20210524/01a3f193/attachment.htm>