[Esip-preserve] Need for recommended best practice for DOI minting?

[Bruce Barkstrom]

with the addendum to Frew's comment that "... or is needed for any
practical use now".

Bruce B.

On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:11 PM, James Frew <frew at bren.ucsb.edu> wrote:

> On 2012-09-07 10:26, Ruth Duerr wrote:
>
>> While the ESIP citation guidelines do talk briefly about best practices
>> in minting DOI's - specifically
>>
>> "Best practice is that the suffix of the identifier does not include a
>> reference to the archive in case the data are moved from the original
>> location where the persistent identifier was assigned initially."
>> ...
>>
>> Is a more comprehensive best practices warranted? If so, what should it
>> say?
>>
>
> Informally, something like:
>
> "Don't encode anything in a DOI that won't be true 100 years from now."
>
> /Frew
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.**org <Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>
> http://www.lists.esipfed.org/**mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve<http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20120909/a1e7acee/attachment.html>