[Esip-preserve] possible session at ESIP

[soren scott]

Just a quick plug. There's interest, in the conversation if nothing else,
over in the Semantic Web cluster for a session about governance of some of
the project artifacts. I pitched it as:

The governance of ontologies, vocabularies, and other shared resources has
been coming up across communities (RDA, EarthCube, ESIP, etc) and across
domains (semantic web, software sustainability, documentation, and others).
The conversations I've been involved with across those areas are often much
the same so what can we share about what works and what doesn't? What are
the systems that support some of those governance requirements? And our
larger who should be responsible for managing these systems and the objects
within?


If that's of interest to anyone here, please let me know. The last, for
those who haven't been on the SemWeb calls this fall, are related to what
ESIP's role may be in that and if ESIP should have a role in that kind of
system. So if you have thoughts on that as well, chime in.

Thanks,
Soren


On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Denise Hills via Esip-preserve <
esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:

> I’ll add my agreement that I think this is a very good idea. It is broader
> than Data Stewardship, but it could partially fall under that umbrella. One
> thing that I think sessions for the Winter meeting are attempting is
> highlighting what strategic plan goal it aligns with. This session would
> definitely address all 4 goals (see here:
> http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/2015-2020_Strategic_Plan if you need a
> reminder what those goals are).
>
> While there might be a lot to cover, I think we could fit it in a 1.5 hour
> session if done right. We’d need to limit the overview part to very brief,
> lightning-style talks, so that the majority of the time could focus on
> developing the roadmap forward.
>
> Mark, I may not be the best person to help you organize this, but I’m
> willing - especially as I’d like to understand more about what’s happening
> in various groups!
>
> -d
>
>
>
> On Oct 26, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Ruth Duerr via Esip-preserve <
> esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I second Kerstin on this; perhaps it needs to be split into 2 sessions;
> one on reports out - one on discussion?
>
> Ruth
>
> On Oct 26, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Kerstin A Lehnert via Esip-preserve <
> esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think that is a great idea and it would be highly valuable to develop
> some vision and maybe even a roadmap how the various initiatives could work
> together to maximize impact with coordinated development and implementation
> of both technology and policies. In addition to the projects,
> organizations, and initiatives that you mention, I would like to also make
> sure that EarthCube is more embedded in these activities.
>
> I would think that this session would need more than the regular 1.5
> hours, just considering the time it would take to have each one give a
> short overview of goals, structure, and activities. It would be important
> to agree on some critical goals for such session.
>
> Could we set up a call through ESIP or RDA to start a dialog about this
> session?
>
> Kerstin
>
>
> On 10/26/15 08:35 AM, Parsons, Mark via Esip-preserve wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have not been keeping up with conversations about winter meeting
> planning, but I have a session idea that I’d like to hear people’s thoughts
> on. I don’t know if this belongs under the stewardship committee or more
> broadly, but it would seem worthwhile to have a discussion on strategic
> partnerships for ESIP.
>
> There’s a lot going on in the data world these days. Is ESIP playing an
> appropriate role? I’m of course thinking of RDA, but there is also the
> Council of Data Facilities and COPDESS. The Belmont Forum e-infrastructure
> initiative is moving in to an implementation phase, whatever that might
> mean. RDA/US is coordinating a collaboration effort of domain repositories
> to try and amplify their voice at a national level (this includes non-Earth
> science repositories). The National Data Service is up and running and
> exploring some test bed activities with RDA/US. Force11, CODATA, and others
> are doing things about data citation. I’m sure there’s more.
>
> ESIP members are involved in all these activities and maybe that’s
> sufficient, but maybe we could be more coordinated and strategic. Perhaps
> this is just a discussion at the business meeting, but I think it could be
> more. We could hear short reports on the various initiatives and then
> discuss ways forward. We had the beginnings of this conversation in Copper
> Mountain last summer. It would be good to continue.
>
> What do people think? I could help coordinate, but I’d want help.
>
> cheers,
>
> -m.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
>
> --
> Dr. Kerstin Lehnert
> Director, Interdisciplinary Earth Data Alliance
> Director, EarthChem
> President, IGSN e.V.
>
> Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
> Columbia University
> Palisades, NY, 10964
> (845) 365-8506
> http://www.iedadata.org
> http://www.earthchem.org
> http://www.igsn.org
>
> <lehnert.vcf>_______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20151029/ce35a537/attachment.html>