[Esip-preserve] time to update the citation guidelines?

[Parsons, Mark]

Yes. Probably a bit overdue. It would be nice to have real world examples instead of “The Foo Data Set” too.


cheers,

-m.
On Jun 20, 2016, at 13:04, Ruth Duerr via Esip-preserve <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>> wrote:

Hi all,

I’ve been fielding questions from all directions on use of DOI’s for data sets, etc.  I think it is time to update the ESIP guidelines with better identifier information.  Anyone interested in helping with that?  Is it a good idea?  I think this is still a moving field; but I do believe that there are better and worse ways of moving forward and would like ESIP to promulgate the better ways…

Thoughts?

Ruth

"I have met some pretty crappy “scientists” at institutions who get paid well, but don’t do science and wouldn’t know it if it pooped on their feet. In contrast, many people who have investigated some of the most pressing and interesting issues of the last couple of centuries did it out of curiosity, excitement, worry, or desperation.”

- Fraser Shilling in email to citsci-discussion-l at list.cornell.edu<mailto:citsci-discussion-l at list.cornell.edu> discussion list

Ruth Duerr
Research Scholar
Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship
ruth.duerr3 at gmail.com<mailto:ruth.duerr3 at gmail.com>

_______________________________________________
Esip-preserve mailing list
Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20160620/696b5dc9/attachment.html>