[Esip-preserve] time to update the citation guidelines?

[Hampapuram Ramapriyan]

Ruth,

For NASA Earth science data the following might of interest: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/earth-observation-data/data-citations-acknowledgements and https://earthdata.nasa.gov/open-data-and-the-importance-of-data-citations-the-nasa-eosdis-perspective from a general “policy” point of view. I can provide a couple of specific citation examples as well. Again, we are basing this work on the ESIP guidelines, pointed to at the bottom of the page led to by the first link above.

Rama.

 

From: Esip-preserve [mailto:esip-preserve-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Ruth Duerr via Esip-preserve
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 12:35 PM
To: Jeff de La Beaujardiere - NOAA
Cc: esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
Subject: Re: [Esip-preserve] time to update the citation guidelines?

 

Thanks Jeff!  I am sure we will use at least one example from NOAA (want to get a variety of examples from a variety of places).

 

And obviously the NOAA Directive should be on our reference list (if it isn’t already)...

 

Ruth

 

On Jun 20, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Jeff de La Beaujardiere - NOAA <jeff.delabeaujardiere at noaa.gov> wrote:

 

Feel free to use any of the following as real-world examples:

http://search.datacite.org/ui?q=10.7289 <http://search.datacite.org/ui?q=10.7289&fq=resourceType_facet:%22Dataset%22> &fq=resourceType_facet:%22Dataset%22

 

Also feel free to borrow any ideas or text from the NOAA Data Citation Directive, which was inspired by the original ESIP guidelines: https://nosc.noaa.gov/EDMC/PD.DC.php

 

-Jeff DLB

 




Jeff de La Beaujardiere, PhD 
NOAA Data Management Architect 
1335 East-West Hwy, Silver Spring MD 20910 USA 
+1 301 713 7175 (NESDIS/ACIO-S - SSMC1/5308) 
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1001-9210

 

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Parsons, Mark via Esip-preserve <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:

Yes. Probably a bit overdue. It would be nice to have real world examples instead of “The Foo Data Set” too. 

 

 

cheers,

 

-m. 

On Jun 20, 2016, at 13:04, Ruth Duerr via Esip-preserve <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:

 

Hi all, 

 

I’ve been fielding questions from all directions on use of DOI’s for data sets, etc.  I think it is time to update the ESIP guidelines with better identifier information.  Anyone interested in helping with that?  Is it a good idea?  I think this is still a moving field; but I do believe that there are better and worse ways of moving forward and would like ESIP to promulgate the better ways…

 

Thoughts?

 

Ruth

 

"I have met some pretty crappy “scientists” at institutions who get paid well, but don’t do science and wouldn’t know it if it pooped on their feet. In contrast, many people who have investigated some of the most pressing and interesting issues of the last couple of centuries did it out of curiosity, excitement, worry, or desperation.”

 

- Fraser Shilling in email to citsci-discussion-l at list.cornell.edu discussion list

 

Ruth Duerr

Research Scholar

Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship
ruth.duerr3 at gmail.com

 

_______________________________________________
Esip-preserve mailing list
Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve

 


_______________________________________________
Esip-preserve mailing list
Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve

 

 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20160620/be43d024/attachment-0001.html>