[Esip-semantictech] [Esip-semanticharmonization] [EXT] Alternating/rotating time slot for semantic harmonization meetings? (2nd try)

[Pier Luigi Buttigieg]

Yes, tough to manage. 
We could have parallel meetings with overlapping time zones (or even relay hackathons) with a less frequent and painful all-hands meeting. 

⁣Sent from BlueMail ​

On 14 Aug 2020, 18:57, at 18:57, Ruth Duerr via Esip-semanticharmonization <esip-semanticharmonization at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>Well we could go for two time slots as Brandon suggests... At worst
>folks could attend every other one...
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Aug 14, 2020, at 3:15 AM, Kai Blumberg via
>Esip-semanticharmonization
><esip-semanticharmonization at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I'm guessing the issue comes down to finding a time that works for
>North America, Europe and Australia/Newzealand. It's currently set up
>to work for North America/Europe (late). 
>> <image.png>
>> 
>> 
>> Not sure how to solve this ATM. 
>> Cheers,
>> Kai
>> 
>>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:06 AM Brandon Whitehead via
>Esip-semanticharmonization
><esip-semanticharmonization at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>>> External Email
>>> 
>>> (re-sending unsigned; previous message came through blank with
>>> attachment)
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> Has there been consideration for alternating the time of the regular
>>> Semantic Harmonization meetings?
>>> 
>>> I would very much like to participate but I am consistently unable
>to
>>> attend.  If it's just me, then so be it.  It may encourage wider
>>> participation.  Would anyone else find this useful?
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>> /Brandon
>>> ------
>>> Brandon Whitehead
>>> Environmental Data Scientist
>>> Manaaki Whenua -- Landcare Research
>>> www.landcareresearch.co.nz
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> 
>>> Please consider the environment before printing this email
>>> Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is
>confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use,
>disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately
>by reply email and then delete the emails.
>>> The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare
>Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz
>>> -- 
>>> Esip-semanticharmonization mailing list
>>> Esip-semanticharmonization at lists.esipfed.org
>>>
>https://lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-semanticharmonization
>>> 
>> -- 
>> Esip-semanticharmonization mailing list
>> Esip-semanticharmonization at lists.esipfed.org
>> https://lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-semanticharmonization
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>-- 
>Esip-semanticharmonization mailing list
>Esip-semanticharmonization at lists.esipfed.org
>https://lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-semanticharmonization
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-semantictech/attachments/20200814/82b3e02d/attachment.htm>