[esip-semanticweb] FW: help with marking up WMS/WCS Capability docs? Use triple tags?

[Raskin, Rob (388M)]

Brian-

The telecon was at 11am PDT. It is over, but notes will be posted.

-Rob

------------------------------------
Rob Raskin
Group Supervisor, Science Data Engineering and Archiving
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Pasadena, CA 91109
(818) 354-4228
________________________________________
From: esip-semanticweb-bounces at rtpnet.org [esip-semanticweb-bounces at rtpnet.org] On Behalf Of Wilson, Brian D (335G) [bdwilson at jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 12:32
To: esip-semanticweb at rtpnet.org
Subject: [esip-semanticweb] FW: help with marking up WMS/WCS Capability docs? Use triple tags?

Hello,

For the telecon at 1 PM, I can describe (and advocate for)
machine or triple tags if that makes sense.

Rather than make slides, we can simply refer to the discussion
of triple tags at flickr.

See http://www.flickr.com/groups/api/discuss/72157594497877875/

 -- Brian



-----Original Message-----
From: Wilson, Brian D
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 12:29 PM
To: 'John Graybeal'
Cc: Christopher Lynnes; esip-semanticweb at rtpnet.org; esip-aqcluster at rtpnet.org
Subject: RE: [esip-semanticweb] [ESIP-AQ] help with marking up WMS/WCS Capability docs?

John et al,

Machine tags or triple tags are simply tags that have
three parts:  namespace:facet=value.

They were first invented for geotagging (e.g. geo:long=-172.3),
but they can be used more generally for 'faceted' tagging.

See the discussions at Wikipedia and Flickr below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_(metadata)

http://www.flickr.com/groups/api/discuss/72157594497877875/


The best discussion I've read of the power of tagging is
Gene Smith's "Tagging" book:

http://books.google.com/books?id=QKBlAcdkMwsC&dq=tagging+smith&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=HqTMM8Q3I9&sig=Q7AlqqbVyRhaQ9TVTyj1GTYp4LE&hl=en&ei=KX5fSoPtG9G9lAez2JSlDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1


Hope this helps,

 -- Brian



-----Original Message-----
From: John Graybeal [mailto:graybeal at mbari.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 9:35 PM
To: Wilson, Brian D (335G)
Cc: Christopher Lynnes; esip-semanticweb at rtpnet.org; esip-aqcluster at rtpnet.org
Subject: Re: [esip-semanticweb] [ESIP-AQ] help with marking up WMS/WCS Capability docs?

Can you all describe what you mean by 'machine tags'?

John

On Jul 15, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Wilson, Brian D (335G) wrote:

> Chris et al,
>
> Machine tags are certainly the fastest way to start specifying
> a controlled set of facets and values.  They can serve as a way
> to populate instances into a fuller ontology to be supplied later.
>
> I don't think RDFa is suitable for insertion into XML files.
>
> -- Brian
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: esip-aqcluster-bounces at rtpnet.org [mailto:esip-aqcluster-bounces at rtpnet.org
> ] On Behalf Of Christopher Lynnes
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:54 PM
> To: esip-semanticweb at rtpnet.org
> Cc: esip-aqcluster at rtpnet.org; Erin Robinson
> Subject: [ESIP-AQ] help with marking up WMS/WCS Capability docs?
>
> Greetings!
>
> Over in the Air Quality Cluster, we are experimenting with using some
> kind of structured markup / tagging of OGC WMS and WCS capabilities
> documents (inside <Keyword> elements) to allow us to do structured
> searches on the documents.  An example might be, "give me the layers
> where Dataset = 'OMI_AI_G'". Seehttp://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/WMS_GetCapabilities#WMS_GetCapabilities_Layer_Description
>
> Thing is, we figure if we are going to try to implement this kind of
> markup with a quasi-controlled vocabulary, we should do it in such a
> way that it is compatible with or even leverages the semantic web.  We
> have pondered a machine tags approach, e.g.,
> <Keyword>esip:dataset=OMI_AI_G</Keyword>.  (A link to an initial
> attempt of a WMS that includes the current keyword encoding: http://webapps.datafed.net/AIRNOW.ogc?service=wms&request=getCapabilities&version=1.1.1)
> .
>
> Alternatively, we have heard RDFa mentioned for microformats, though
> mostly in the context of XHTML.  Can this be applied to OGC's XML and
> if so, how?
>
> Can the ESIP Semantic Web cluster provide a recommendation or
> suggestion in how to move forward that would be:
> (a) flexible and extensible,
> (b) compatible with the evolving ESIP datatype and services ontology
> and
> (c) lightweight and easy to use?
> --
> Christopher Lynnes             NASA/GSFC, Code 610.2
> 301-614-5185
>
> _______________________________________________
> ESIP-AQcluster mailing list
> ESIP-AQcluster at rtpnet.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-aqcluster
> _______________________________________________
> esip-semanticweb mailing list
> esip-semanticweb at rtpnet.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-semanticweb


John

--------------
John Graybeal   <mailto:graybeal at mbari.org>  -- 831-775-1956
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org

_______________________________________________
esip-semanticweb mailing list
esip-semanticweb at rtpnet.org
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-semanticweb