[esip-semanticweb] Mapping between CLEAN and SWEET or GCMD

[John Graybeal]

Marshall, Steve, all,

Did you all ever come up with a best practice for bridging the SKOS-OWL divide, as discussed below?  Back in the OWL 1.0 days I know this was, like, unbridgeable, but with 2.0 I think the experts were talking about creating a relation that appropriately related SKOS terms to OWL concepts. But then I had to pay attention to other things....

John


On Nov 2, 2012, at 17:00, steve richard <steve.richard at azgs.az.gov> wrote:

> The SKOS-OWL is particularly interesting to me (instance vs. class). I’ve wrestled with this trying to figure out how to bind the CGI GeoScience vocabularies (http://resource.geosciml.org/201202/) with OWL (e.g. SimpleLithology2012 with CGI_Lithology.owl).
> The issue emerges again in an ontology for geologic map unit integration I’ve been working on. If you’re at the Geological Society of America Meeting in Charlotte next week, come and visit my poster
> Monday Nov 5, Charlotte Convention Center, Hall B, Poster Booth Number: 186. “A GEOLOGIC UNIT SCHEME FOR REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP INTEGRATION”
>  
> steve
>  
> From: esip-semanticweb-bounces at lists.esipfed.org [mailto:esip-semanticweb-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Marshall X Ma
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 4:30 PM
> To: esip-semanticweb at rtpnet.org
> Subject: [esip-semanticweb] Mapping between CLEAN and SWEET or GCMD
>  
> We want to test the mapping between non-specialist vocabularies and specialist vocabularies. A good example can be the mapping between CLEAN vocabulary and SWEET ontology or GCMD keywords.
>  
> Anyone has done/thought this work before or, any ideas on the following questions? Thanks.
>  
> * CLEAN is a non-specialist vocabulary for climate and energy
> ** ref: http://cleanet.org/clean/about/climate_energy_.html
> ** A SKOS encoding of CLEAN vocabulary seralized in turtle format:https://scm.escience.rpi.edu/svn/public/projects/gcis/branches/initial_rdf/skos/clean.ttl
>  
> * [Question 1 ] Mapping between CLEAN vocabulary and SWEET?
> ** We have experience on mapping between two skos vocabularies: using skos:broadMatch, skos:narrowMatch, etc.
> ** SWEET is in OWL encoding
> *** Comparison between a skos concept and an owl class
> *** Anyone has experience on mapping between skos and owl?
>  
> * [Question 2] Or, we can try to map between CLEAN vocabulary and GCMD keywords?
> ** GCMD keywords has its version 7.0 in SKOS encoding:http://gcmd.gsfc.nasa.gov/Connect/docs/kms/KeywordManagementServiceAPI.pdf
>  
>  
> -- Marshall
>  
> Xiaogang (Marshall) Ma
>  
> Postdoctoral Research Associate
> Tetherless World Constellation
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> 110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180, USA
> E-mail: max7 at rpi.edu
> Homepage: https://sites.google.com/site/xgmaitc
>  
> _______________________________________________
> esip-semanticweb mailing list
> esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org
> http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-semanticweb


----------------
John Graybeal    <mailto:jgraybeal at ucsd.edu>     phone: 858-534-2162
Product Manager
Ocean Observatories Initiative Cyberinfrastructure Project: http://ci.oceanobservatories.org
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-semanticweb/attachments/20130330/1b2aefdf/attachment.html>