[esip-semanticweb] FW: IoT-Lite Ontology (Acknowledged Member Submission)

Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) Lewis.J.Mcgibbney at jpl.nasa.gov
Thu Feb 4 19:17:56 EST 2016


Hi esip-semanticweb@,
Please see the formal announcement below (to W3C members) of our
publication of the Internet of Things Lite Ontology.
Some of you may be interested in it.

Thanks
Lewis

On 2/4/16, 12:49 AM, "Phil Archer" <phila at w3.org> wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>I'm forwarding the formal announcement to W3C members of our publication
>of the IoT Lite Ontology that Payam, Kerry and others have been working
>on.
>
>This is a 'Member Submission' - i.e. work that one or more W3C members
>have done and brought to our attention for possible future
>standardisation, or input to other efforts. Dave Raggett (Team contact
>for the Web of Things Interest Group) and I are suggesting that this WG
>and the WoT IG consider reviewing and publishing the IoT Lite Ontology
>as a Note.
>
>I see it as a profile of SSN. If published alongside the W3C Rec
>Track/OGC Standards Track SSN Ontology, it could help to broaden the
>appeal??
>
>Please see that as a suggestion only - it is for the WG to decide what
>to do within its charter. All I would ask is that Ed takes the lead in
>the discussion since Kerry is one of the authors of the IoT Lite work.
>
>Phil.
>
>
>-------- Forwarded Message --------
>Subject: IoT-Lite Ontology (Acknowledged Member Submission)
>Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 04:55:37 +0000
>Resent-From: w3c-ac-members at w3.org
>Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:56:49 +0800
>From: Xueyuan Jia <xueyuan at w3.org>
>To: w3c-ac-forum at w3.org
>
>
>Dear Advisory Committee Representative,
>
>This message is to inform you of the Director's Acknowledgment of the
>IoT-Lite Ontology Submission Request containing one document:
>
>    IoT-Lite Ontology
>    https://www.w3.org/Submission/2015/SUBM-iot-lite-20151126/
>
>The complete Submission Request, including the submitted materials and
>specifications, is publicly available at:
>    https://www.w3.org/Submission/2015/03/
>
>Dave Raggett <dsr at w3.org> and Phil Archer <phila at w3.org> drafted the
>Team Comment:
>    https://www.w3.org/Submission/2015/03/Comment/
>
>This message is sent in accordance with section 10 of the W3C Process
>Document; see that section for more information about the meaning of the
>acknowledgment:
>    https://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#Submission
>
>For a listing of all acknowledged Submissions:
>    http://www.w3.org/Submission/
>
>For Tim Berners-Lee, W3C Director;
>Xueyuan Jia, W3C Marketing & Communications
>
>========================
>IoT-Lite Ontology
>26 November 2015
>========================
>
>Authors:
>----------
>Maria Bermudez-Edo, Institute for Communication Systems, University of
>Surrey and University of Granada
>Tarek Elsaleh, Institute for Communication Systems, University of Surrey
>Payam Barnaghi, Institute for Communication Systems, University of Surrey
>Kerry Taylor, Institute for Communication Systems, University of Surrey
>and The Australian National University
>
>Abstract:
>----------
>IoT-Lite ontology is a lightweight ontology to represent Internet of
>Things (IoT) resources, entities and services. IoT-Lite is an
>instantiation of the SSN ontology. The lightweight allow the
>representation and use of IoT platforms without consuming excessive
>processing time when querying the ontology. However it is also a meta
>ontology that can be extended in order to represent IoT concepts in a
>more detailed way in different domains. It also can be combined with
>ontologies representing IoT data streams such as SAO ontology. Following
>best practices in ontology engineering iot-lite is meant to be used with
>a quantity taxonomy, such as qu-taxo, that allows the discovery and
>interoperability of IoT resources in heterogeneous platforms using a
>common vocabulary.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



More information about the esip-semanticweb mailing list