[esip-semantictech] Next ESIP Semantic Technologies Budget

[Pouchard, Line C]

Dear all:

I have taken a pass at writing up the idea of producing a roadmap for ESIP in the S&T committee that would investigate and plan what it will take for ESIP to support an ontology repository, what are the limitations, the scope, etc…

As the budget is a collaborative and non-competitive activity, I share this here for your comments.

Please have a look and amend as you see fit.  There are missing areas in leveraged activities and collaborators.  For instance I would imagine this to be an activity that John and others may be interested in.  So there are details to fill in.

Please use track changes.

Line


—
Line Pouchard, PhD
Assistant Professor, Purdue Libraries
Computational Science Information Specialist
Stewart Center, Room 174
504 W. State Street
West Lafayette, IN 47907-2058
http://sites.lib.purdue.edu/linepouchard
linepouchard at gmail.com (alternate email)




From: esip-semanticweb <esip-semanticweb-bounces at lists.esipfed.org> on behalf of Erin Robinson via esip-semanticweb <esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>
Reply-To: Erin Robinson <erinrobinson at esipfed.org>
Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 4:14 PM
To: "Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)" <Lewis.J.Mcgibbney at jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: "esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org" <esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>, "esip-ficom at lists.esipfed.org" <esip-ficom at lists.esipfed.org>
Subject: Re: [esip-semantictech] Next ESIP Semantic Technologies Budget

Hi All - Sorry for the double email, one other question came in about whether the budget was competitive or collaborative. This should be a collaborative process to fund things that will support the group and the group should generally agree on the budget before it goes to the Finance committee. From everything I've read on the thread, it sounds like that is what's going on.

E

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Erin Robinson <erinrobinson at esipfed.org<mailto:erinrobinson at esipfed.org>> wrote:
Hi Lewis -

One other quick note - Since this is the first year that the Semantic Web group has been a committee, it hasn't had a budget.

Budget instruction can be found here: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Federation_Documents

E

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) via esip-semanticweb <esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>> wrote:
Hi Tom,
At the last meeting, someone asked where last years budget wasŠ no one
seemed to know.
Do you know where it is so some of us new comers can get a peek into
format and content?
Off the top of my head, some things which were mentioned were
 * there may be nothing wrong with resubmitting/repurposing last years
budget req.
 * the Semantic Ontology Implementation/COR/whatever needs to be factored
into the budget
 * Bhaskar spoke very encouragingly about putting some kind of
paper/article/journal entry together representing the direction of
semantics within the Earth Sciences. Maybe we could request some budget
resources to drive this work on?
Thanks
Thanks


On 8/25/16, 9:00 AM, "esip-semanticweb on behalf
oesip-semanticweb-request at lists.esipfed.orgf"
<esip-semanticweb-bounces at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-semanticweb-bounces at lists.esipfed.org> on behalf of
esip-semanticweb-request at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-semanticweb-request at lists.esipfed.org>> wrote:

>
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:06:03 +0000
>From: "Narock, Thomas" <tnarock at ndm.edu<mailto:tnarock at ndm.edu>>
>To: ESIP Semantic Web Cluster <esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>>
>Subject: [esip-semantictech] Next ESIP Semantic Technologies Budget
>Message-ID: <CEEAF64B-30B7-49B4-82FE-5E071AF51CC3 at ndm.edu<mailto:CEEAF64B-30B7-49B4-82FE-5E071AF51CC3 at ndm.edu>>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>All,
>
>ESIP leadership has requested that all committees submit budget requests
>for the next fiscal year by September 1. Over the next week I?d like to
>gather your input on items you feel are essential to the budget. A few
>guidelines to keep in mind. Our total budget request should be in the 10k
>range.  Although, please note we are not guaranteed to receive that
>amount. It?s more of an upper limit on committee requests. Also, each
>line item in the budget must have proper justification and align with a
>specific deliverable. For example, asking for discretionary travel funds
>will not be approved. However, asking for funds for 1 person to represent
>us at a specific meeting because it directly impacts the committee has a
>better chance of being approved.
>
>And student fellows must go through the broader ESIP fellow program. I
>don?t believe we can fund students directly through our budget. If you
>have a promising student interested in semantics, please encourage them
>to apply to the fellows program, which is now open.
>
>So, please start thinking about our current trajectory and where you?d
>like to see funds devoted over the next year. Feel free to discuss here
>on the mailing list or contact myself and Beth directly. The only item we
>had in the budget last year was funding to support the ontology portal
>instances. We?re looking to expand this year and are in need of your
>feedback.

_______________________________________________
esip-semanticweb mailing list
esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-semanticweb


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-semanticweb/attachments/20160831/2d07edd8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SandTroadmap_proposal.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 154838 bytes
Desc: SandTroadmap_proposal.docx
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-semanticweb/attachments/20160831/2d07edd8/attachment-0001.docx>