[Esip-semanticharmonization] ***SPAM*** Re: SWEET ENVO Cryosphere term mapping

[Pier Luigi Buttigieg]

Thanks Kai - good stuff.

We can highlight some of these that are missing in ENVO to add during 
the session.

Thus the session plan looks like:

 1. Intro on the Semantic Harmonisation cluster, including note on
    semantic gradient and where ENVO and SWEET sit on it (Ruth)
 2. Presentation of the NMDC's needs for semantic harmonisation,
    finishing with this list of terms (Kai/Bill)
 3. Beginning of demo session where we will add 1-2 terms (and
    contextual terms) to ENVO, wrangling the definitions from Ruth's GCW
    work along the way.(PL/Ruth)
 4. Discussion restating the need for early harmonisation /
    co-development / import rather than duplication.


@Team: Any preferences on which terms (currently not in ENVO) we should 
add?

On 17/06/2020 21:10, Kai Blumberg wrote:
> Hey everyone, I've created this mapping between what I can tell are 
> all the cryosphere terms from SWEET with terms from ENVO: 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O-3UW1RLp1UNaS2sNWfpIULmgIedB0NCBsYd1MaWWZY/edit?usp=sharing 
>
>
> There should be some material here for Pier to work with in the next 
> demo about SWEET terms missing from ENVO.
>
> Cheers,
> Kai
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-semanticharmonization/attachments/20200618/5080d6bf/attachment.htm>