[Esip-semanticharmonization] [EXT]Re: SWEET ENVO Cryosphere term mapping

[Kai Blumberg]

I've updated the sheet, I had missed classes from the SWEET atmospheric
precipitation hierarchy.

As for suggestions I'd defer to Ruth's domain expertise, but some I have:

1) SWEET `hoar crystal`: ENVO has a hoar
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001845> hierarchy, however, two of
it's subclasses glaze <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001849> and
hoarfrost <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001847> are missing
definitions

2) SWEET `ice stream`: ENVO has englacial stream
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_03000018> which seems similar but may
or may not be the same concept.

3) SWEET `seasonal ice`: ENVO has a sea ice
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_00002200> hierarchy which includes first
year ice <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_03000071> with seasonal ice
as a related synonym, but not as an exact synonym so perhaps this can be
further pinned down.

4) Finally some other SWEET concepts missing from ENVO include: `hail` (as
a material we have the process), `graupel`, `granular ice`, `ice particle`,
`ice pellet`, `sleet`, `snow facies`, `snow grain`

Cheers,
Kai

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:37 AM Pier Luigi Buttigieg <
pbuttigi at mpi-bremen.de> wrote:

> *External Email*
>
> Thanks Kai - good stuff.
>
> We can highlight some of these that are missing in ENVO to add during the
> session.
>
> Thus the session plan looks like:
>
>    1. Intro on the Semantic Harmonisation cluster, including note on
>    semantic gradient and where ENVO and SWEET sit on it (Ruth)
>    2. Presentation of the NMDC's needs for semantic harmonisation,
>    finishing with this list of terms (Kai/Bill)
>    3. Beginning of demo session where we will add 1-2 terms (and
>    contextual terms) to ENVO, wrangling the definitions from Ruth's GCW work
>    along the way.(PL/Ruth)
>    4. Discussion restating the need for early harmonisation /
>    co-development / import rather than duplication.
>
>
> @Team: Any preferences on which terms (currently not in ENVO) we should
> add?
>
> On 17/06/2020 21:10, Kai Blumberg wrote:
>
> Hey everyone, I've created this mapping between what I can tell are all
> the cryosphere terms from SWEET with terms from ENVO:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O-3UW1RLp1UNaS2sNWfpIULmgIedB0NCBsYd1MaWWZY/edit?usp=sharing
>
> There should be some material here for Pier to work with in the next demo
> about SWEET terms missing from ENVO.
>
> Cheers,
> Kai
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-semanticharmonization/attachments/20200618/fd5d3fe7/attachment.htm>