[Esip-semanticharmonization] ESIP Semantics Session- Training Questionnaire

[Anne Thessen]

I don't have access to the form

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 5:42 PM Ruth Duerr <ruth.duerr3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Kate,
>
> I’ve taken a look at the Google form and think in general that something
> like that will work.  I also have updated some topics in our Outline of
> Semantics Training document, which might help further with the form.  I do
> have one question though.  What the heck are “In-peron online modules”?
>
> I also cc’d our ESIP mailing list and added our invited speakers to this
> email…. I wish we would use the email list more!
>
> Ruth
>
> On Jul 7, 2023, at 12:44 PM, Kate Rose - NOAA Affiliate <
> Kate.Rose at noaa.gov> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Several of us met with Charley last week to fine tune the agenda
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AlHNSHDoNvBT5wTC7F6QSROd9mt8Yyo5SrXpQYO8sjY/edit> and
> logistics for our session. The first hour will be an introduction, then
> short presentations and a panel discussion.
>
> The last half hour is dedicated to getting input from the participants
> about any future semantics training they would like so that we can
> prioritize 1. the topics we ought to focus on, and 2. what training format
> (e.g., workshops, online modules) people would be most likely to use. We
> decided that a Google Form would be the best way for us to present options
> to participants.
>
> I created this form
> <https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1McIKK16XcPnpxjVnRTtx1qGZo2DCcnzcGeLD9vNpUmw/prefill> to
> get us started. It includes many of the training topics in the Outline of
> Semantics Training doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wvI7JWJPsEBt4EaxRiUp9dTccSIMXbJzEoHGNKacfzI/edit?usp=sharing>,
> which summarizes the Jamboard submissions from our January meeting session.
>
>    - Each section (purple header) in the form is a topic category with
>    two questions
>       - a multiple choice question for ranking the importance of specific
>       topics
>       - a checkbox grid question with the topics in rows and the training
>       formats in columns
>       - The checkbox grid allows multiple selections so you can select
>       more than one training type for a topic (it would be very easy to switch
>       the format to a multiple choice grid, which only allows one training type
>       selection per topic)
>    - There is an open text question for people to enter any additional
>    topics/formats
>
> Google Forms automatically generates summary charts as forms are
> submitted. These are the Example Summary Stats
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r1uTfRui3PX6_4n3qUIKobCuDtlH0eY0xvp4eaqNy2Q/edit?usp=sharing> for
> my form responses.
>
> What does everyone think about the format? We will need to work on the
> topics and the phrasing of the questions, etc. I added a *Google Form
> Categories/Topics* section to the Outline of Semantics Training doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wvI7JWJPsEBt4EaxRiUp9dTccSIMXbJzEoHGNKacfzI/edit?usp=sharing> if
> you'd like to edit and add to those, or we can discuss during our call next
> week.
>
> thanks,
> Kate
>
>
> Kate Rose
> She/Her/Hers
> Senior Research Associate
> Northern Gulf Institute / Mississippi State University
> NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information
> 1021 Balch Blvd
> Stennis Space Center, MS 39529
>
> Tel: 228-688-1878
> Telework: 213-810-0185
> kate.rose at noaa.gov
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-semanticharmonization/attachments/20230711/e794a5c5/attachment-0001.htm>