[Esip-citationguidelines] Contribution vs Credit vs Authorship for software – Daniel S. Katz's blog

[Sophie Hou]

Hi Mark,

I agree; especially since Matt and I had an IDCC15 poster demonstrating
exactly that: :-)

http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/IDCC15/175_Creatingaclimatemodel.pdf

Best,
Sophie


On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 6:03 PM Parsons, Mark via Esip-citationguidelines <
esip-citationguidelines at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:

> Thoughts on credit from our friend Dan Katz.
>
>
> https://danielskatzblog.wordpress.com/2019/01/23/contribution-vs-credit-vs-authorship-for-software/
>
>
> I like how he works to separate the different levels of credit and more
> importantly:
>
> "In the longer term, we need to stop using the term author as the means of
> recognizing all significant contributions, and possibly go to a movie-like
> system where we name contributors and explain their contributions, and
> where author would be one of many types of contribution.”
>
> Something for us to consider.
>
> cheers,
>
> -m.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-citationguidelines mailing list
> Esip-citationguidelines at lists.esipfed.org
> https://lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-citationguidelines
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-citationguidelines/attachments/20190123/0e194567/attachment.html>