[Esip-citationguidelines] Current Status

[Matt Jones]

I went through it and the document is looking good.  I've made a few
changes that I don't think would be controversial based on the comments.
Feel free to reject those if that's not the case.  In general I would be
very happy to support this recommendation as it is written.  I added my
name at the bottom.  Thanks Mark and everyone who lead the charge on this.

Matt

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:50 AM Parsons, Mark via Esip-citationguidelines <
esip-citationguidelines at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We have walked through the document
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DjM8SBJOOSSwANoOmW6arN-KiwAv1895K0tZkLU5sxs/edit?usp=sharing> up
> to “subset used”
>
> I have made “Suggested” changes (colored text) up to that point that
> should address comments and our discussion over the last two calls. Please
> review and suggest edits or comment. If there are no significant changes by
> next weeks call, then I will accept all the changes up to that point. We
> will pick-up with subset-used next week.
>
> Bruce Wilson and Matt Jones, you should especially take a look because we
> believe we have resolved your comments.
>
> cheers,
>
> -m.
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-citationguidelines mailing list
> Esip-citationguidelines at lists.esipfed.org
> https://lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-citationguidelines
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-citationguidelines/attachments/20190221/ef9e4775/attachment-0001.html>