[Esip-cor] More irrelevant submissions marked 'owner'

[Annie Burgess]

Hi all -

I defer to you on COR governance issues. I wonder if you could address the
TOU during the next COR cluster meeting and bash it out during that hour?
AB

_

Annie Burgess, PhD

Lab Director | Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)

*esipfed.org/lab <http://esipfed.org/lab>* | 585.738.7549







On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 7:19 PM John Graybeal <jgraybeal at stanford.edu>
wrote:

> I think I'm not able to keep up as thoroughly as I want with COR, and so I
> share a fair bit of the responsibility for making these things happen, or
> not.
>
> In that regard, Carlos, I propose that one appropriate strategy on your
> part is to let go of the curation you can't keep up with. If I'm not doing
> it fast enough for Annie, Lewis, and the community to be happy with, and no
> one else volunteers, we can discuss as a team what should be done. (Perhaps
> an ESIP lab to create an experimental change to the system along the lines
> you propose.)
>
> I will also remind the senior guy that's sending people our way that it's
> not really working for us and some changes are likely.
>
> John
>
> On Aug 21, 2020, at 5:29 PM, Carlos Rueda <carueda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Annie et al:
>
> I have just marked some more of these submissions with 'owner' visibility.
>
> Alas, I don't have the cycles to keep monitoring/adjusting this.
>
> This reminds me that there's still no "terms of use"!  One key such term
> should be that any irrelevant submissions are subject to removal without
> any notice, or something along those lines.
>
> As a reminder, the planned "acceptance of the terms of use" upon account
> creation was implemented a couple months ago (but not in place for COR due
> to the missing corresponding pointer in the configuration).
>
> Of course, this is all rather tricky and for sure there are missing
> functionality features that would help a bit with the administrative
> process, for example, just throwing one quick idea, that new accounts
> should indicate the intended use of the system to be approved before the
> user can submit ontologies, etc ...
>
> For now, I'm happy to adjust entries as time permits, but your involvement
> is really necessary.
>
> Carlos
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:57 AM Carlos Rueda <carueda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> John et al:  Noting that this seems to be from the same source of flood
>> of submissions to the MMI instance, I just went ahead and changed the
>> visibility of this submission to "owner".
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 7:01 AM ESIP COR via Esip-cor <
>> esip-cor at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A new ontology version has been registered:
>>>
>>>  IRI: http://cor.esipfed.org/ont/~amr/syrain_cinema
>>>
>>>  Name: syrain cinema
>>>  Version: 20200820T131147
>>>  Owner: ~amr
>>>  Submitter: amr
>>>  Updated: 2020-08-20T13:11:47.000Z
>>>  Status: testing
>>>  Visibility: public
>>>  Log: (not given)
>>>
>>>
>>> (You have received this email because your address is included in
>>> /etc/orront/notifyemails)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Esip-cor mailing list
>>> Esip-cor at lists.esipfed.org
>>> https://lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-cor
>>>
>>
> ========================
> John Graybeal
> Technical Program Manager
> Center for Expanded Data Annotation and Retrieval /+/ NCBO BioPortal
> Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research
> 650-736-1632  | ORCID  0000-0001-6875-5360
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-cor/attachments/20200824/6c2bf198/attachment.htm>