[Esip-dds] A data life cycle model

[Anne Wilson]

Thanks for the discussion, all!  I believe we've agreed that "many 
feedback loops may be interpreted" through the  model.   I've updated 
the wiki page to reflect this agreement: 
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Science_data_life_cycle_model.

I'm starting a new email thread on using that in our literature review, 
look for that soon.  I think I'll start a new wiki page also.

Anne

On 2/12/13 12:02 PM, Ruth Duerr wrote:
> Given those words, I would say that this is a fine data life cycle for
> us to adopt.
>
> - Ruth
>
> On Feb 12, 2013, at 11:33 AM, "Ramapriyan, Hampapuram K. (GSFC-4230)"
> <hampapuram.k.ramapriyan at nasa.gov
> <mailto:hampapuram.k.ramapriyan at nasa.gov>> wrote:
>
>> Actually, the report from which the data life cycle that looks linear
>> (Figure C2) was extracted had a science project lifecycle diagram
>> (Figure C1) which was indeed a closed cycle. The words that appear
>> between the two figures are:
>> “The science data lifecycle is given in Figure C2. The data outputs of
>> a science project are freestanding artifacts that must be maintained
>> intact, secure, and accessible for future uses, foreseen and
>> unforeseen, but archived or disposed of when no longer useful. Within
>> this linear construct, many data maintenance feedback loops may be
>> interpreted through this simplified model. Programs will plan next set
>> of data acquisitions based on discoveries from the current one and
>> would use lessons learned from data management to plan the evolution
>> of data system for future datasets.”
>> Rama.
>> *From:*esip-dds-bounces at lists.esipfed.org
>> <mailto:esip-dds-bounces at lists.esipfed.org>
>> [mailto:esip-dds-bounces at lists.esipfed.org
>> <mailto:dds-bounces at lists.esipfed.org>]*On Behalf Of*Ruth Duerr
>> *Sent:*Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:09 PM
>> *To:*Erin Robinson
>> *Cc:*esip-dds at lists.esipfed.org <mailto:esip-dds at lists.esipfed.org>
>> *Subject:*Re: [Esip-dds] A data life cycle model
>> Hi Erin,
>> Yup - definitely a cycle and not linear; but I think there are a lot
>> of potential loops between more or less every part of the cycle, so I
>> think a simple model even a linear model is OK as long as we all
>> realize that point.
>> Ruth
>> On Feb 12, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Erin Robinson <erinrobinson at esipfed.org
>> <mailto:erinrobinson at esipfed.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Anne - Is there any input from old data into planning for new data. I
>> don't think of the data lifecycle being so linear, more spiral?
>> Just my 2 cents.
>>
>> E
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Anne Wilson
>> <anne.wilson at lasp.colorado.edu <mailto:anne.wilson at lasp.colorado.edu>>
>> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I propose we use the CENDI IWGDD life cycle model.  I made a page with
>> more information at the
>> wiki:http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Science_data_life_cycle_model.
>> Please provide comments.
>>
>> Our next step is figure out how to use this material to distribute and
>> summarize the results of the literature review task, yes?
>>
>> Any thoughts on moving forward?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Anne
>> _______________________________________________
>> Esip-dds mailing list
>> Esip-dds at lists.esipfed.org <mailto:Esip-dds at lists.esipfed.org>
>> http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-dds
>> _______________________________________________
>> Esip-dds mailing list
>> Esip-dds at lists.esipfed.org <mailto:Esip-dds at lists.esipfed.org>
>> http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-dds
>>
>