[Esip-discovery] ESIP DCP-1: Atom Response Format for OpenSearch, DataCasting, & ServiceCasting

[Hua, Hook (388C)]

The review period is concluding for the Discovery Change Proposal (DCP)-1 for "an ESIP Discovery Cast Atom Response Format v1.1".

I’ve updated the format v1.1 spec based on feedback from the responses so far:
<http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Cast_Atom_Response_Format_v1.1>http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Cast_Atom_Response_Format_v1.1

Changes include:

 *   adopting IANA rel link conventions
 *   expanding ESIP-specific rel link types to include namespace
 *   settling on a namespace.

Since we have our next Discovery Cluster telecon next Tuesday (2011-03-08)<x-apple-data-detectors://1>, that might be a good opportunity to have a final round of verbal discussions before we vote on the spec. Until then, we should review the revised spec.

Nothing was discussed for the custom tag extensions approach. What about ECHO adopting GeoRSS-Simple for adding support of points and lines? Are we ok with those?

--Hook




On Feb 15, 2011, at 1:01 PM, "Lynnes, Christopher S. (GSFC-6102)" <christopher.s.lynnes at nasa.gov<mailto:christopher.s.lynnes at nasa.gov>> wrote:

Discussion of this proposal is now open.  See the mediawiki discussion page at:
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Talk:Discovery_Cast_Atom_Response_Format_v1.1

To subscribe to all changes to the Discussion page, click:
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php?title=Talk:Discovery_Cast_Atom_Response_Format_v1.1&action=watch

On Feb 11, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Hua, Hook (388C) wrote:

Much of the Discovery Cluster will be dealing with forming community-based
and interoperable specifications for OpenSearch, DataCasting, &
ServiceCasting.

The initial Discovery Change Proposal (DCP)-1 for an ESIP Discovery Cast
Atom Response Format v1.1 is posted:
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Change_Proposal-1

The format has roots from discussions originating from our ESDSWG New
Orleans meeting last October. But we still need your feedback. Some open
questions include:

(1) what namespace to adopt? discovery, esipdiscovery, ...
(2) adopt some of the new OGC rel link types? See Chris' forwarded email.
(3) use the "opensearch" namespace spec for pagination?
...

This format will be under review for comments and revisions until March 1.
We then plan on voting for approval as a spec. This will be our first
exercise of the governance process.

Adding additional changes or new proposals are documented here:
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Governance


--Hook

_______________________________________________
Esip-discovery mailing list
Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org>
http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-discovery

--
Dr. Christopher Lynnes     NASA/GSFC, Code 610.2    phone: 301-614-5185


_______________________________________________
Esip-discovery mailing list
Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org>
http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-discovery
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-discovery/attachments/20110302/3b7efb54/attachment.html>