[Esip-discovery] Voting results for ESIP DCP-1: Atom Response Format for OpenSearch, DataCasting, & ServiceCasting

Hua, Hook (388C) hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov
Mon Mar 21 17:56:59 EDT 2011


Posted on the wiki are the results of the voting for DCP-1.
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Change_Proposal-1#Consensus
5 yays to 0 nays.
Let's hope we get less voter apathy the second time around! But thank you to all that voted.
For transparency, the trail of the voting log is posted on the wiki.

Before making it official, we'll just open it up for a final review of the specification for last minute tweaks. These are intended to be mostly formatting/grammar changes and not specification changes. Since there were no outcries during the voting, this should go quick. Shall we say one day for final review, and we'll ratify DCP-1 in 24-hours?

--Hook


________________________________________
From: esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org [esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Hua, Hook (388C) [hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 3:59 PM
To: esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
Subject: Re: [Esip-discovery] Voting for ESIP DCP-1: Atom Response Format for OpenSearch, DataCasting, & ServiceCasting

Let’s extend the voting period for a week since this is the first time around doing this. And we need to reach out to more people. We’ll shoot for tallying up the votes next Monday.

In the mean time, we can start looking as a community at formulating additional needed Discovery specifications. Sean Mccleese has a got one on Datacasting custom elements.

We also have a few incubation ideas here:
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Change_Proposals#Incubation_Ideas
Please feel free to add to the list!

--Hook


________________________________
From: Hook Hua <hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:04:08 -0700
To: Hook Hua <hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: <esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org>
Conversation: Voting for ESIP DCP-1: Atom Response Format for OpenSearch, DataCasting, & ServiceCasting
Subject: Voting for ESIP DCP-1: Atom Response Format for OpenSearch, DataCasting, & ServiceCasting

Voting is now open for DCP-1: ESIP Discovery Cast Atom Response Format v1.1
http://www.doodle.com/hh2rk7z68dsnk69t

Results will be tallied on Monday.

At our latest telecon (http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Telecon_2011-03-08), we discussed final changes to the spec, updated the spec, and decided on a mechanism of voting. We said we needed a stronger 3/5 majority of Yays to Nays, and that the editors can veto. Most agreed that it is better not to do voting anonymously since we really want to hash out any concerns.

--Hook


________________________________
From: Hook Hua <hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 01:10:58 -0800
Cc: <esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org>
Subject: Re: [Esip-discovery] ESIP DCP-1: Atom Response Format for OpenSearch, DataCasting, & ServiceCasting

The review period is concluding for the Discovery Change Proposal (DCP)-1 for "an ESIP Discovery Cast Atom Response Format v1.1".

I’ve updated the format v1.1 spec based on feedback from the responses so far:
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Cast_Atom_Response_Format_v1.1 <http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Cast_Atom_Response_Format_v1.1>

Changes include:

 *   adopting IANA rel link conventions
 *   expanding ESIP-specific rel link types to include namespace
 *   settling on a namespace.

Since we have our next Discovery Cluster telecon next Tuesday (2011-03-08) <x-apple-data-detectors://1> , that might be a good opportunity to have a final round of verbal discussions before we vote on the spec. Until then, we should review the revised spec.

Nothing was discussed for the custom tag extensions approach. What about ECHO adopting GeoRSS-Simple for adding support of points and lines? Are we ok with those?

--Hook




On Feb 15, 2011, at 1:01 PM, "Lynnes, Christopher S. (GSFC-6102)" <christopher.s.lynnes at nasa.gov> wrote:

Discussion of this proposal is now open.  See the mediawiki discussion page at:
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Talk:Discovery_Cast_Atom_Response_Format_v1.1

To subscribe to all changes to the Discussion page, click:
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php?title=Talk:Discovery_Cast_Atom_Response_Format_v1.1&action=watch

On Feb 11, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Hua, Hook (388C) wrote:

Much of the Discovery Cluster will be dealing with forming community-based
and interoperable specifications for OpenSearch, DataCasting, &
ServiceCasting.

The initial Discovery Change Proposal (DCP)-1 for an ESIP Discovery Cast
Atom Response Format v1.1 is posted:
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Change_Proposal-1

The format has roots from discussions originating from our ESDSWG New
Orleans meeting last October. But we still need your feedback. Some open
questions include:

(1) what namespace to adopt? discovery, esipdiscovery, ...
(2) adopt some of the new OGC rel link types? See Chris' forwarded email.
(3) use the "opensearch" namespace spec for pagination?
...

This format will be under review for comments and revisions until March 1.
We then plan on voting for approval as a spec. This will be our first
exercise of the governance process.

Adding additional changes or new proposals are documented here:
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Governance


--Hook

_______________________________________________
Esip-discovery mailing list
Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-discovery

--
Dr. Christopher Lynnes     NASA/GSFC, Code 610.2    phone: 301-614-5185


_______________________________________________
Esip-discovery mailing list
Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-discovery



More information about the Esip-discovery mailing list