[Esip-discovery] DCP-1 ratified. more DCP specs needed for greater ESIP Discovery interoperbility.

[Cechini, Matthew F. (GSFC-423.0)[RAYTHEON COMPANY]]

My vote would be to address one DCP at a time to limit how long meetings
run, allowing for us to focus on one issue at a time.  With regards to
which items we address next, can someone provide a 3-4 sentence
blurb/abstract on each item to define better what the context of each item
is?

Matt

Matthew F Cechini
ECHO Operations Lead - Systems Engineer
Office: (301) 851-8049
Cell  : (202) 251-8013
Fax   : (301) 851-8283
E-Mail: Matthew.F.Cechini at nasa.gov





On 3/22/11 3:48 PM, "Hua, Hook" <hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

>Thank you everyone for your contributions, feedback, and votes for DCP-1.
>It is officially ratified.
>
>But as the other mailing list threads show, we still have plenty of
>specifications to hash out for improving interoperability.
>http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Change_Proposals#Incubation_Id
>eas
>
>Question for the cluster: should we generally pursue as many concurrent
>DCPs specs as needed, or should be we limit discussions to one DCP at a
>time?
>
>Do any of the other Discovery Editors want facilitate the next DCPs?
>
>--Hook
>
>________________________________________
>From: esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org
>[esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Hua, Hook (388C)
>[hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov]
>Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 2:56 PM
>To: esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
>Subject: [Esip-discovery] Voting results for ESIP DCP-1: Atom Response
>Format for OpenSearch, DataCasting, & ServiceCasting
>
>Posted on the wiki are the results of the voting for DCP-1.
>http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Change_Proposal-1#Consensus
>5 yays to 0 nays.
>Let's hope we get less voter apathy the second time around! But thank you
>to all that voted.
>For transparency, the trail of the voting log is posted on the wiki.
>
>Before making it official, we'll just open it up for a final review of
>the specification for last minute tweaks. These are intended to be mostly
>formatting/grammar changes and not specification changes. Since there
>were no outcries during the voting, this should go quick. Shall we say
>one day for final review, and we'll ratify DCP-1 in 24-hours?
>
>--Hook
>
>_______________________________________________
>Esip-discovery mailing list
>Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
>http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-discovery