[Esip-discovery] DCP-1 ratified. more DCP specs needed for greater ESIP Discovery interoperbility.
Lynnes, Christopher S. (GSFC-6102)
christopher.s.lynnes at nasa.gov
Wed Mar 23 13:37:50 EDT 2011
On Mar 22, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Hua, Hook (388C) wrote:
> Thank you everyone for your contributions, feedback, and votes for DCP-1. It is officially ratified.
> But as the other mailing list threads show, we still have plenty of specifications to hash out for improving interoperability.
> Question for the cluster: should we generally pursue as many concurrent DCPs specs as needed, or should be we limit discussions to one DCP at a time?
I think we need to be able to do concurrent, as some DCP discussions may go on for a while.
> Do any of the other Discovery Editors want facilitate the next DCPs?
I have plans to do a micro-DCP for daynightflag...
> From: esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org [esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Hua, Hook (388C) [hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 2:56 PM
> To: esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
> Subject: [Esip-discovery] Voting results for ESIP DCP-1: Atom Response Format for OpenSearch, DataCasting, & ServiceCasting
> Posted on the wiki are the results of the voting for DCP-1.
> 5 yays to 0 nays.
> Let's hope we get less voter apathy the second time around! But thank you to all that voted.
> For transparency, the trail of the voting log is posted on the wiki.
> Before making it official, we'll just open it up for a final review of the specification for last minute tweaks. These are intended to be mostly formatting/grammar changes and not specification changes. Since there were no outcries during the voting, this should go quick. Shall we say one day for final review, and we'll ratify DCP-1 in 24-hours?
> Esip-discovery mailing list
> Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
Dr. Christopher Lynnes NASA/GSFC, Code 610.2 phone: 301-614-5185
More information about the Esip-discovery