[Esip-discovery] DCP-1 ratified. more DCP specs needed for greater ESIP Discovery interoperbility.
Hua, Hook (388C)
hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov
Wed Mar 23 14:09:25 EDT 2011
Thanks Chris and Matt for your inputs.
It sounds like we could benefit from a mailing list feature that is also synced up with a web-based forums discussion. This helps to cleanly manage concurrent discussion threads. All postings online are mailed to the list. Email replies to the the list also show up in the forums.
The OpenSearch Google Groups seems to leverage this feature:
It's more like gmail-style discussion threads applied towards mailing lists.
From: Lynnes, Christopher S. (GSFC-6102) [christopher.s.lynnes at nasa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:37 AM
To: Hua, Hook (388C)
Cc: esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
Subject: Re: [Esip-discovery] DCP-1 ratified. more DCP specs needed for greater ESIP Discovery interoperbility.
On Mar 22, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Hua, Hook (388C) wrote:
> Thank you everyone for your contributions, feedback, and votes for DCP-1. It is officially ratified.
> But as the other mailing list threads show, we still have plenty of specifications to hash out for improving interoperability.
> Question for the cluster: should we generally pursue as many concurrent DCPs specs as needed, or should be we limit discussions to one DCP at a time?
I think we need to be able to do concurrent, as some DCP discussions may go on for a while.
> Do any of the other Discovery Editors want facilitate the next DCPs?
I have plans to do a micro-DCP for daynightflag...
> From: esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org [esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Hua, Hook (388C) [hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 2:56 PM
> To: esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
> Subject: [Esip-discovery] Voting results for ESIP DCP-1: Atom Response Format for OpenSearch, DataCasting, & ServiceCasting
> Posted on the wiki are the results of the voting for DCP-1.
> 5 yays to 0 nays.
> Let's hope we get less voter apathy the second time around! But thank you to all that voted.
> For transparency, the trail of the voting log is posted on the wiki.
> Before making it official, we'll just open it up for a final review of the specification for last minute tweaks. These are intended to be mostly formatting/grammar changes and not specification changes. Since there were no outcries during the voting, this should go quick. Shall we say one day for final review, and we'll ratify DCP-1 in 24-hours?
> Esip-discovery mailing list
> Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
Dr. Christopher Lynnes NASA/GSFC, Code 610.2 phone: 301-614-5185
More information about the Esip-discovery