[Esip-discovery] Charrette process
Hua, Hook (388C)
hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov
Thu Dec 13 13:47:47 EST 2012
If we go with a constant 6 groups a priori, shall we also determine ~6
perspectives in step 0 to use in the following steps?
Then I think it would be useful to create 6 google docs in advance, so
that each group can collaboratively populate the google doc during the
I recall at the EarthCube Charrette, some group members stayed behind,
while a few others left to other groups to cross-pollinate ideas, and then
came back to report. So for example, if we have 7 people in a group, we
could have 4 people stay behind, 3 people visit 3 other groups to exchange
ideas. Each group's members that stayed behind would answer questions from
Having said this, I think it would only be effective if there is
sufficiently large number of participants.
On 12/13/12 9:50 AM, "Lynnes, Christopher S. (GSFC-6102)"
<christopher.s.lynnes at nasa.gov> wrote:
>On Dec 13, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Christine White wrote:
>> I like the mingle aspect of Step 4 - I think perhaps there should be a
>>time limit though to keep folks moving, e.g., 10 minutes to mingle with
>>other groups and find out what their GC's are,
>I thought we could just put them all up in a Google doc to allow folks to
>see what they are. However, to promote the mingling, we could tell the
>groups to send people to other groups to ask questions for
>clarifications. They did this at the Earth Cube Charrette.
>What do you think?
>> then return to one's own group and discuss for 10 before coming
>>together for a mapping of the connections (?).
>> Christine White
>> SDI Solutions Team, Esri
>> 909-793-2853 x 4355
>> cwhite at esri.com
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org
>>[mailto:esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Lynnes,
>>Christopher S. (GSFC-6102)
>> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 8:31 AM
>> To: esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
>> Subject: [Esip-discovery] Charrette process
>> 0 - Define / present goals of process, different perspectives*
>> 1 - Count off into N / 6 groups, where N is n umber of attendees
>> 2 - In the first brainstorming period, each group tries to develop one
>>grand challenge use case for each perspective**
>> 3 - We make all of the GC's available to everyone
>> 4 - In the second period, each group goes on a scavenger hunt for GC's
>>that are complementary to their own
>> 5 - we then look at the various connections that have been made as a
>> *science researcher, long tail data provider, etc.
>> **but if they end up with an unbalanced set that is OK
>> Sent from my iPad
>> Esip-discovery mailing list
>> Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
>Dr. Christopher Lynnes NASA/GSFC, Code 610.2 phone: 301-614-5185
>"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when
>there is nothing left to take away" -- A. de Saint-Exupery
>Esip-discovery mailing list
>Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
More information about the Esip-discovery