[Esip-documentation] ACDD-1.3 documentation change request: Descriptions of "resolution" attributes

[David Neufeld - NOAA Affiliate]

Ajay,

Similar to Jim's comments to Nan and Aaron, I would recommend not including
"point".

Dave

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Ajay Krishnan - NOAA Affiliate via
Esip-documentation <esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org> wrote:

> John,
>>
>>
>>
>> * > Should I not even attempt to use
>> geospatial_[lat|lon|vertical]_resolution in my netCDF files? The attributes
>> in question do not appear to apply to your case (unless you have multiple
>> points at different lat, lon, or height locations, but it sounds like you
>> don't). So all this may be our problem, but you can ignore it now.*
>
>
> I manage the NetCDF templates at NODC. My question is, are we right in
> recommending "point" for the geospatial_lat_resolution attribute in the
> case of discrete sampling geometry or would it be better to not include
> that in the file at all?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ajay
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-documentation mailing list
> Esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-documentation
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-documentation/attachments/20150227/f907892b/attachment.html>