[Esip-preserve] Anybody out there yet?

[Alice Barkstrom]

To all:

Do we have enough information to begin to flesh out
a session for the July ESIP.  For example, would it
be useful to have something like the following talks
in plenary:
         NARA Rep. [I can see if we could get one]
                 Discussion of NARA Preservation Philosophy,
                         Policies, and Procedures
         Library of Congress Rep. [NDIIPP or whatever
                 that's morphed into]
                 Discussion of LoC Preservation Philosophy,
                         Policies, and Procedures
         NASA Rep. [presumably Martha]
                 NASA Specifics on Preservation and
                         Stewardship
         NOAA Rep. [Again, I can check here at NCDC,
                 even though I've retired.]
                 NOAA Specifics on Preservation and
                         Stewardship
Perhaps followed by a session on what ESIP can do
to aid the process.

Bruce B.

At 03:02 PM 2/6/2009, Niemann.Brand at epamail.epa.gov wrote:
>Yes, Martha is co-chairing the Subgroup on Agency Science Data 
>Policies for the Interagency Working Group on Digital Data which is 
>preparing a report on this subject.
>
>Brand
>
>
>-----esip-preserve-bounces at rtpnet.org wrote: -----
>
>To: Peter Fox <pfox at cs.rpi.edu>, Christopher Lynnes <Chris.Lynnes at nasa.gov>
>From: Alice Barkstrom <alicebarkstrom at verizon.net>
>Sent by: esip-preserve-bounces at rtpnet.org
>Date: 02/06/2009 12:40PM
>cc: esip-preserve at rtpnet.org
>Subject: Re: [Esip-preserve] Anybody out there yet?
>
>I am as well.  I've spent the last couple of weeks
>working on a model for software development
>contingency and reviewing a paper.  I'll return to
>writing up a paper on production paradigms.
>
>You might want to see if Martha Maiden has
>anything in writing on the NASA policy.  As I
>recall, NARA and the Library of Congress are
>the agencies with the ultimate authority on
>archival and preservation.  Their authority is
>usually delegation under "Records Management".
>To the best of my knowledge, NASA is not
>authorized by NARA to retain archives for
>long-term preservation.  NOAA, and probably
>only NCDC, actually has that authorization.
>I'll see if I can dig up the NOAA policy, which
>has been undergoing some revisions in the
>last year.
>
>Bruce B.
>
>At 11:54 AM 2/6/2009, Peter Fox wrote:
> >I am.
> >
> >---Peter.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On 06/02/2009, at 11:32 AM, Christopher Lynnes wrote:
> >
> >>I did some minor editing on the ESIP preservation cluster site to
> >>make the page more modular, uploaded a couple salient references.  I
> >>wanted to track down some explicit NASA data preservation policies,
> >>but they seem to be a bit thin on the ground...Anyone know where
> >>they can be found?
> >>--
> >>Christopher Lynnes             NASA/GSFC, Code 610.2
> >>301-614-5185
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Esip-preserve mailing list
> >>Esip-preserve at rtpnet.org
> >><http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve>http://rtpnet.or 
> g/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Esip-preserve mailing list
> >Esip-preserve at rtpnet.org
> ><http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve>http://rtpnet.org 
> /mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Esip-preserve mailing list
>Esip-preserve at rtpnet.org
><http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve>http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rtpnet.org/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20090206/5cf70fb6/attachment.htm>