[Esip-preserve] Townhall abstract
foxp at rpi.edu
Fri Aug 14 12:43:50 EDT 2009
An example would be: not that you have any/all this situation...
We wish the TH to follow X session at AGU which is requested to be
scheduled on Monday.
We wish to precede the agency night (we)
We wish to precede the section/fg meetings (Tu)
We have a key presenter who is only available on Monday.
Why / how would broad interdisciplinary input be best achieved on
You get the idea?
On 14/08/2009, at 12:25 PM, Mark A. Parsons wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Here's a cut at an abstract. It is exactly 100 words, so any edits
> cannot make it longer.
> Peter, I don't really know where to justify our Monday request, but
> I note: To ensure broad interdisciplinary input, we request the
> meeting be scheduled for Monday evening.
> Peer-reviewed data publication and other strategies to sustain
> verifiable science.
> Objective, verifiable science requires formal, reviewed publication
> of data and research results. Data publication contributes to many
> necessary scientific processes including transparency,
> reproducibility, documentation of uncertainty, and preservation. The
> AGU Council reaffirmed this fundamental responsibility in a new
> position statement (http://www.agu.org/outreach/science_policy/positions/geodata.shtml
> Nonetheless, data publication lacks established cultural practice
> for modern data volumes and complexity. This townhall will briefly
> present the AGU position statement and some evolving data
> publication practice. We then seek input from all disciplines on
> modern approaches for data peer-review and peer-recognition,
> citation, and other verification practices. The Federation of Earth
> Science Information Partners will publish discussion results.
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at rtpnet.org
More information about the Esip-preserve