[Esip-preserve] apropos yesterday's data publishing session

[Parsons, Mark]

Actually the whole ERCIM issue is appropriate. Several good examinations of different models of data publishing and an article on the dynamic citation approach to be discussed tomorrow.

Kerstin, I’m not sure we can ever really get rid of the term publishing, but we need to be careful with it. Publishing is  better than “publication” at least. I think I’m leaning more and more to Peter’s favored term—release. Like software.

cheers,

-m.
On Jan 7, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Parsons, Mark <parsom3 at rpi.edu<mailto:parsom3 at rpi.edu>> wrote:

And another piece apropos the data sharing session:

http://ercim-news.ercim.eu/en100/special/beyond-data-process-sharing-and-reuse

cheers,

-m.
On Jan 7, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Parsons, Mark via Esip-preserve <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>> wrote:

Chris Borgman has a short piece out in which she states: "As argued in depth elsewhere, data are not publications [1]. The “data publication” metaphor, commonly used in promoting open access to data and encouraging data citation, similarly muddies the waters.”

It’s also a nice, succinct explanation of the need for context.

http://ercim-news.ercim.eu/en100/special/if-data-sharing-is-the-answer-what-is-the-question

cheers,

-m.
_______________________________________________
Esip-preserve mailing list
Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20150107/f41e4ffa/attachment.html>