[Esip-preserve] possible session at ESIP

[Ramdeen, Sarah]

Count me in if needed.  I am active in a number of different communities (many which seem to already be represented in these emails).

Thanks!
Sarah

Sarah Ramdeen Doctoral Candidate
School of Information and Library Science
University of North Carolina
ramdeen at email.unc.edu<mailto:ramdeen at email.unc.edu>
http://ramdeen.web.unc.edu/

From: Esip-preserve [mailto:esip-preserve-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Danie Kinkade via Esip-preserve
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 10:30 AM
To: esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
Subject: Re: [Esip-preserve] possible session at ESIP

I'm on board with Denise, right down to willingness to help, as it too would further my understanding about ESIP's groups and its ties to various external efforts.
-Danie

On 10/26/15 9:42 AM, Denise Hills via Esip-preserve wrote:
I'll add my agreement that I think this is a very good idea. It is broader than Data Stewardship, but it could partially fall under that umbrella. One thing that I think sessions for the Winter meeting are attempting is highlighting what strategic plan goal it aligns with. This session would definitely address all 4 goals (see here: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/2015-2020_Strategic_Plan if you need a reminder what those goals are).

While there might be a lot to cover, I think we could fit it in a 1.5 hour session if done right. We'd need to limit the overview part to very brief, lightning-style talks, so that the majority of the time could focus on developing the roadmap forward.

Mark, I may not be the best person to help you organize this, but I'm willing - especially as I'd like to understand more about what's happening in various groups!

-d


On Oct 26, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Ruth Duerr via Esip-preserve <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>> wrote:

Hi Mark,

I second Kerstin on this; perhaps it needs to be split into 2 sessions; one on reports out - one on discussion?

Ruth

On Oct 26, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Kerstin A Lehnert via Esip-preserve <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>> wrote:


Hi Mark,

I think that is a great idea and it would be highly valuable to develop some vision and maybe even a roadmap how the various initiatives could work together to maximize impact with coordinated development and implementation of both technology and policies. In addition to the projects, organizations, and initiatives that you mention, I would like to also make sure that EarthCube is more embedded in these activities.

I would think that this session would need more than the regular 1.5 hours, just considering the time it would take to have each one give a short overview of goals, structure, and activities. It would be important to agree on some critical goals for such session.

Could we set up a call through ESIP or RDA to start a dialog about this session?

Kerstin


On 10/26/15 08:35 AM, Parsons, Mark via Esip-preserve wrote:

Hi all,

I have not been keeping up with conversations about winter meeting planning, but I have a session idea that I'd like to hear people's thoughts on. I don't know if this belongs under the stewardship committee or more broadly, but it would seem worthwhile to have a discussion on strategic partnerships for ESIP.

There's a lot going on in the data world these days. Is ESIP playing an appropriate role? I'm of course thinking of RDA, but there is also the Council of Data Facilities and COPDESS. The Belmont Forum e-infrastructure initiative is moving in to an implementation phase, whatever that might mean. RDA/US is coordinating a collaboration effort of domain repositories to try and amplify their voice at a national level (this includes non-Earth science repositories). The National Data Service is up and running and exploring some test bed activities with RDA/US. Force11, CODATA, and others are doing things about data citation. I'm sure there's more.

ESIP members are involved in all these activities and maybe that's sufficient, but maybe we could be more coordinated and strategic. Perhaps this is just a discussion at the business meeting, but I think it could be more. We could hear short reports on the various initiatives and then discuss ways forward. We had the beginnings of this conversation in Copper Mountain last summer. It would be good to continue.

What do people think? I could help coordinate, but I'd want help.

cheers,

-m.


_______________________________________________
Esip-preserve mailing list
Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve

--
Dr. Kerstin Lehnert
Director, Interdisciplinary Earth Data Alliance
Director, EarthChem
President, IGSN e.V.

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Columbia University
Palisades, NY, 10964
(845) 365-8506
http://www.iedadata.org
http://www.earthchem.org
http://www.igsn.org

<lehnert.vcf>_______________________________________________
Esip-preserve mailing list
Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve

_______________________________________________
Esip-preserve mailing list
Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve





_______________________________________________

Esip-preserve mailing list

Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>

http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve




--

Danie Kinkade

Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office

Department of Biology

Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

266 Woods Hole Road, MS#36

Woods Hole, MA  02543

508.289.2291
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20151026/fb8cb1e3/attachment.html>