[Esip-preserve] possible session at ESIP

Mon Oct 26 10:29:31 EDT 2015

I'm on board with Denise, right down to willingness to help, as it too 
would further my understanding about ESIP's groups and its ties to 
various external efforts.
-Danie

On 10/26/15 9:42 AM, Denise Hills via Esip-preserve wrote:
> I’ll add my agreement that I think this is a very good idea. It is 
> broader than Data Stewardship, but it could partially fall under that 
> umbrella. One thing that I think sessions for the Winter meeting are 
> attempting is highlighting what strategic plan goal it aligns with. 
> This session would definitely address all 4 goals (see here: 
> http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/2015-2020_Strategic_Plan if you need 
> a reminder what those goals are).
>
> While there might be a lot to cover, I think we could fit it in a 1.5 
> hour session if done right. We’d need to limit the overview part to 
> very brief, lightning-style talks, so that the majority of the time 
> could focus on developing the roadmap forward.
>
> Mark, I may not be the best person to help you organize this, but I’m 
> willing - especially as I’d like to understand more about what’s 
> happening in various groups!
>
> -d
>
>
>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Ruth Duerr via Esip-preserve 
>> <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org 
>> <mailto:esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I second Kerstin on this; perhaps it needs to be split into 2 
>> sessions; one on reports out - one on discussion?
>>
>> Ruth
>>
>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Kerstin A Lehnert via Esip-preserve 
>> <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org 
>> <mailto:esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> I think that is a great idea and it would be highly valuable to 
>>> develop some vision and maybe even a roadmap how the various 
>>> initiatives could work together to maximize impact with coordinated 
>>> development and implementation of both technology and policies. In 
>>> addition to the projects, organizations, and initiatives that you 
>>> mention, I would like to also make sure that EarthCube is more 
>>> embedded in these activities.
>>>
>>> I would think that this session would need more than the regular 1.5 
>>> hours, just considering the time it would take to have each one give 
>>> a short overview of goals, structure, and activities. It would be 
>>> important to agree on some critical goals for such session.
>>>
>>> Could we set up a call through ESIP or RDA to start a dialog about 
>>> this session?
>>>
>>> Kerstin
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/26/15 08:35 AM, Parsons, Mark via Esip-preserve wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have not been keeping up with conversations about winter meeting 
>>>> planning, but I have a session idea that I’d like to hear people’s 
>>>> thoughts on. I don’t know if this belongs under the stewardship 
>>>> committee or more broadly, but it would seem worthwhile to have a 
>>>> discussion on strategic partnerships for ESIP.
>>>>
>>>> There’s a lot going on in the data world these days. Is ESIP 
>>>> playing an appropriate role? I’m of course thinking of RDA, but 
>>>> there is also the Council of Data Facilities and COPDESS. The 
>>>> Belmont Forum e-infrastructure initiative is moving in to an 
>>>> implementation phase, whatever that might mean. RDA/US is 
>>>> coordinating a collaboration effort of domain repositories to try 
>>>> and amplify their voice at a national level (this includes 
>>>> non-Earth science repositories). The National Data Service is up 
>>>> and running and exploring some test bed activities with RDA/US. 
>>>> Force11, CODATA, and others are doing things about data citation. 
>>>> I’m sure there’s more.
>>>>
>>>> ESIP members are involved in all these activities and maybe that’s 
>>>> sufficient, but maybe we could be more coordinated and strategic. 
>>>> Perhaps this is just a discussion at the business meeting, but I 
>>>> think it could be more. We could hear short reports on the various 
>>>> initiatives and then discuss ways forward. We had the beginnings of 
>>>> this conversation in Copper Mountain last summer. It would be good 
>>>> to continue.
>>>>
>>>> What do people think? I could help coordinate, but I’d want help.
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>>
>>>> -m.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Esip-preserve mailing list
>>>> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org 
>>>> <mailto:Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>
>>>> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Dr. Kerstin Lehnert
>>> Director, Interdisciplinary Earth Data Alliance
>>> Director, EarthChem
>>> President, IGSN e.V.
>>>
>>> Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
>>> Columbia University
>>> Palisades, NY, 10964
>>> (845) 365-8506
>>> http://www.iedadata.org
>>> http://www.earthchem.org
>>> http://www.igsn.org
>>>
>>> <lehnert.vcf>_______________________________________________
>>> Esip-preserve mailing list
>>> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
>>> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Esip-preserve mailing list
>> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org <mailto:Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>
>> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve


-- 
Danie Kinkade
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office
Department of Biology
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
266 Woods Hole Road, MS#36
Woods Hole, MA  02543
508.289.2291

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20151026/398fe041/attachment-0001.html>