[ESIP-all] FW: NGA Proposal to Withdraw Geographic Data and Maps]
Carol B. Meyer
carol.meyer at earthsciencefoundation.org
Tue Mar 29 08:44:14 EST 2005
The following may be of interest to you.
Subject:
NGA Proposal to Withdraw Geographic Data and Maps
Date:
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:16:42 -0500
From:
Harlan Onsrud <mailto:onsrud at spatial.maine.edu%3e>
<onsrud at spatial.maine.edu>
Dear UCGIS Members,
I believe this is an issue of general interest to the mapping
academic community. As many of you know, the National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency (NGA) intends to withdraw all of its aeronautical
products from public access. The federal register announcements may
be found at http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2004/11/nga111804.html and
http://www.sej.org/foia/FR_Doc_04-27645.txt
Are we as academics informed about and voicing our opinions on this matter?
Below is a recent comment from a private cartography firm. Further
commentaries or resources on the issue may be found in the resources
listed at the end of this message.
If you are interested in making a "for" or "against" comment to NGA,
you have until June 30 to do so. Send your comments to
aero.ocr at nga.mil
If you wish to share your opinion with others in addition to the NGA,
perhaps join the list at
http://lists.gsdi.org/mailman/listinfo/legal-econ and ship a copy to
that list.
Best, Harlan Onsrud
onsrud at spatial.maine.edu
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Forwarded from a private distribution list with permission.
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:35:18 -0600
Dear All:
Peter Weiss of NOAA has asked me to step in for him and send a quick
summary on a rather arcane but nonetheless vital subject: the
Pentagon's planned total withdrawal from public access of thousands
of maps and associated databases dealing with global aviation. The
clock is ticking: the Pentagon's mapping agency, NGA, has set a
deadline of June 30 for public objections. (This deadline was
already extended once, from January 17.) If left unchallenged, then
on October 1, 2005 largest act of cartographic censorship in US
history will proceed as currently outlined in the Federal Register.
A detailed background piece on this subject is found at
http://www.cartographic.com/documents/Open%20Memorandum%20on%20NGA%2010%20Ja
n%202005.pdf
(1.4 Mb)
As the primary author of this, I am happy to provide further
information or answer any questions.
The NGA withdrawal of global aeronautical charts is unfortunately
just one of a number of negative steps by this agency. All point in
the same direction: dramatically decreasing access to the US public
of global mapping and imagery data of all kinds. In mid-2004 NGA
succeeded in a ten-year quest to have many of their publications
exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). Then shortly before the 2004 Thanksgiving
holidays NGA quietly issued an announcement in the Federal Register
to withdraw aeronautical charts. As part of the counter response to
this action, it became apparent to myself and others that--pending
their success on the aeronautical front--NGA also planned to withdraw
from the US public another entire class of mapping data, namely their
global nautical charts. (Withdrawing these charts, for example,
would severely compromise independent or journalistic investigations
of such accidents as the recent crash of the USS San Francisco.
Using a flawed and out-of-date NGA nautical chart, the submarine
plowed at full speed into an uncharted seamount in the Pacific Ocean,
killing one sailor and severely injuring dozens more.) And in the
past year NGA lawyers have begun to threaten independent websites
such as GlobalSecurity.org, who have played an important part in
illustrating the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with NGA products of
all kinds not easily available by other means. In short, NGA's
publications are rapidly becoming like DoD organizational charts and
telephone directories--formerly public, and now totally restricted to
US Federal officials.
Leading NGA's rationale for cutting US public access to these maps is
the oft-cited Global War on Terror. The attached background piece
examines this issue in detail. In fact the "terrorist threat"
argument is a canard. Peter Weiss reminded me that NGA itself
commissioned and paid for a major RAND Corporation study on precisely
this issue in the aftermath of September 11. The RAND conclusion:
NGA's (and other US Government) maps in the public domain should
remain in the public domain. Initial fears of the utility of such
items to terrorists were overblown; moreover, real damage to the
public welfare would occur should the maps and associated data be
restricted. The RAND study may be found at www.fgdc.gov.
In fact the main reason for the NGA's quiet urgency to see
aeronautrical charts removed from public access stems from
bureacratic incompetency. The whole issue was sparked by a row with
NGA's Australian counterpart in a dispute over the fate of
copyrighted Australian aeronautical data in an NGA global database
known as "DAFIF" (Defense Aeronautical Flight Information File). The
dispute was a completely foreseeable issue, preceeded by years of
Australian requests to protect their data in bilateral negotiations.
(The Australians, similar to the British and to a lesser degree the
Canadians, take an aggressive commercial approach to data created at
government expense.) In spring 2004 the Australians announced their
intention to cease current data contributions to the NGA database,
which is re-issued every four weeks. NGA officials had plenty of
time to avoid this outcome, which with the absence of current
Australian aeronautical data technically poses a threat to any user
of this database over that part of the Earth's skies covered by the
traditional global division-of-labor by the US and its map-making
allies. (The focus of the Australians' frustration was the
highly-profitable Jeppesen-Sanderson company, a Boeing subsidiary and
commercial provider of aeronautical databases who add value to and
repackage the NGA DAFIF database.) The easiest and most obvious
solutions somehow eluded the NGA officials. First, they could have
issued the database with a notice that specific elements were
copyrighted by other data providers (functionally NGA had done the
same thing with Australian paper maps made available to the US public
for many years). Alternatively, they could have issued a redacted
version of the database (with notice of the affected areas to warn
civil aviation users of data-void areas) for the US public, which
would have left intact the 95+ percent of the database content not
affected by foreign government copyright claims.
Finally, the restriction of NGA data is basically nothing more than a
speed bump (perhaps more appropriate to the circumstances--minor
turbulence) to the commercial sector. Large companies like Jeppesen
will continue serving up expensive databases to their clients, and
sooner or later they will reach a business accord with the
Australians. Any increased costs will just be passed along to the
ultimate consumer of civil aviation, the passenger. And even for
some small companies, like East View Cartographic, the disappearance
of cheap US government maps and databases will remove a certain
source of competition. Believe me, we have already bought up all the
available NGA products, paper and digital. The day NGA stops selling
to the public is the day we raise our prices. Sorry, it's the
American way. But it will make life more difficult for the average
consumer or public library who no longer has access to one of the
great gifts of the Pentagon to the world--a global set of
English-language charts at five different levels of detail that is
affordable to anyone (and free to hundreds of libraries via the
Federal Library Depository Program). In the short and medium term,
the private sector will actually benefit from cartographic
censorship. But in the long term, eventually we ourselves will
become targets of the censors--if nothing else as a putative source
of comfort and data to America's terrorist enemies.
Best regards,
Kent D. Lee
President and CEO
East View Cartographic, Inc.
Minneapolis, MN
klee at cartographic.com
www.cartographic.com
www.eastview.com
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Further commentaries or resources on this issue may be found at the
following links:
Secrecy News
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/2005/02/020905.html
The Age of Missing Information, by Aftergood
http://slate.msn.com/id/2114963/
Teaching Guide for "Terrorism and Democratic Virtues" Essays, Social
Science Research Council
http://www.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/teaching_resource/tr_terrorism.htm
Access to Geographic Information: Openness versus Security, by Onsrud
http://www.spatial.maine.edu/~onsrud/pubs/OpenessVsSecurityPreprint.pdf
---
You are currently subscribed to all as: jrtownsh at geog.umd.edu.
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-all-1494H at listserve.ucgis.org
If you are prompted for a password send an email to webmaster at ucgis.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.rtpnet.org/mailman/private/esip-all/attachments/20050329/63040d63/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the ESIP-all
mailing list