[Esip-discovery] DCP-1 ratified. more DCP specs needed for greater ESIP Discovery interoperbility.

[Cechini, Matthew F. (GSFC-423.0)[RAYTHEON COMPANY]]

Hook,
   I'm not sold on having another mailing list / discussion forum outside
of the existing list.  If the syncing is automatic, then I have less
concern.  Relying on the "cc:" field  and having two lists could be
problematic.  

Matt


Matthew F Cechini
ECHO Operations Lead - Systems Engineer
Office: (301) 851-8049
Cell  : (202) 251-8013
Fax   : (301) 851-8283
E-Mail: Matthew.F.Cechini at nasa.gov





On 3/23/11 2:09 PM, "Hua, Hook" <hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

>Thanks Chris and Matt for your inputs.
>
>It sounds like we could benefit from a mailing list feature that is also
>synced up with a web-based forums discussion. This helps to cleanly
>manage concurrent discussion threads. All postings online are mailed to
>the list. Email replies to the the list also show up in the forums.
>
>The OpenSearch Google Groups seems to leverage this feature:
>http://groups.google.com/group/opensearch
>It's more like gmail-style discussion threads applied towards mailing
>lists.  
>
>--Hook
>
>________________________________________
>From: Lynnes, Christopher S. (GSFC-6102) [christopher.s.lynnes at nasa.gov]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:37 AM
>To: Hua, Hook (388C)
>Cc: esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
>Subject: Re: [Esip-discovery] DCP-1 ratified. more DCP specs needed for
>greater ESIP Discovery interoperbility.
>
>On Mar 22, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Hua, Hook (388C) wrote:
>
>> Thank you everyone for your contributions, feedback, and votes for
>>DCP-1. It is officially ratified.
>>
>> But as the other mailing list threads show, we still have plenty of
>>specifications to hash out for improving interoperability.
>> 
>>http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Change_Proposals#Incubation_I
>>deas
>>
>> Question for the cluster: should we generally pursue as many concurrent
>>DCPs specs as needed, or should be we limit discussions to one DCP at a
>>time?
>
>I think we need to be able to do concurrent, as some DCP discussions may
>go on for a while.
>>
>> Do any of the other Discovery Editors want facilitate the next DCPs?
>
>I have plans to do a micro-DCP for daynightflag...
>
>>
>> --Hook
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org
>>[esip-discovery-bounces at lists.esipfed.org] On Behalf Of Hua, Hook (388C)
>>[hook.hua at jpl.nasa.gov]
>> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 2:56 PM
>> To: esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
>> Subject: [Esip-discovery] Voting results for ESIP DCP-1: Atom Response
>>Format for OpenSearch, DataCasting, & ServiceCasting
>>
>> Posted on the wiki are the results of the voting for DCP-1.
>> http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_Change_Proposal-1#Consensus
>> 5 yays to 0 nays.
>> Let's hope we get less voter apathy the second time around! But thank
>>you to all that voted.
>> For transparency, the trail of the voting log is posted on the wiki.
>>
>> Before making it official, we'll just open it up for a final review of
>>the specification for last minute tweaks. These are intended to be
>>mostly formatting/grammar changes and not specification changes. Since
>>there were no outcries during the voting, this should go quick. Shall we
>>say one day for final review, and we'll ratify DCP-1 in 24-hours?
>>
>> --Hook
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Esip-discovery mailing list
>> Esip-discovery at lists.esipfed.org
>> http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-discovery
>
>--
>Dr. Christopher Lynnes     NASA/GSFC, Code 610.2    phone: 301-614-5185
>
>