[Esip-sustainabledm] Fwd: FW: Info for upcoming ESIP meeting

[Margaret O'Brien]

FWD from Anne -
This is her conversation with Neil Beagrie. He is interested in our list of
candidate metrics, so Anne will send that on to him.

Margaret
------------
Margaret O'Brien
ORCID: 0000-0002-1693-8322
Information Management
Marine Science Institute, UCSB
Santa Barbara, CA 93106
805-893-2071 (voice)
http://environmentaldatainitiative.org
http://sbc.marinebon.org
http://sbc.lternet.edu



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anne Wilson <Anne.Wilson at lasp.colorado.edu>
Date: Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 1:56 PM
Subject: FW: Info for upcoming ESIP meeting
To: Margaret O'Brien <margaret.obrien at ucsb.edu>, Neil Beagrie <
neil at beagrie.com>


Hi Neil,

Perhaps you already got this - if so, sorry!   I am having trouble with the
ESIP email list, and thus resending this message to Margaret for
forwarding.    My apologies for any spam.

Margaret, thank you for following up with me and forwarding this!

Anne




On 7/14/17, 3:54 PM, "Anne Wilson" <Anne.Wilson at lasp.colorado.edu> wrote:

>Hi Neil,
>
>We are all very pleased that you have agreed to join us (remotely) at our
ESIP session in 2 weeks!!   We just finished our group telecon where we
discussed the upcoming session.   I’m writing now to convey those thoughts
to you, and possibly hold an email conversation with the group.
>
>Our group represents 9 data centers that, for various reasons, need
metrics regarding their utility.   (Though I expect other data center
representatives will attend this session.   Past ROI sessions at ESIP have
been well attended.)  We range from large to small, old to new.  Some have
large user bases and some are small.   We have a variety of funding sources.
>
>We have skimmed some of the material you provided us, and will be looking
more closely at the 2 in depth reports.   A major question for us is: which
aspects of the social/economic and biomedical toolkits would be applicable
in Earth and space science, and which are not applicable?  How would an
Earth and space science toolkit be different?
>
>Last winter we developed a set of metrics that we then ranked in terms of
perceived value, i.e., how valuable would it be to actually have that
particular metric available.   For example, one metric is knowing the
number of users that ‘found’ a dataset.   We could share that list of
metrics with you, if that might help you focus the presentation.
>
>Beyond this, is there any other information you would like from us?
>
>These are just things for you to think about, and maybe someone else from
our group will join the conversation.   In the meantime, I will see you on
GoTo next Tuesday for our test of the teleconferencing software with Dan
Keyes.
>
>Thank you for thinking about this and making yourself available, Neil!
We greatly appreciate that.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Anne Wilson
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-sustainabledm/attachments/20170717/c90e4176/attachment.html>